按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
The females of brutes have an almost constant fecundity。 But in the human species； the manner of thinking； the character； the passions； the humour； the caprice； the idea of preserving beauty； the pain of child…bearing； and the fatigue of a too numerous family； obstruct propagation in a thousand different ways。
2。 Of Marriage。 The natural obligation of the father to provide for his children has established marriage； which makes known the person who ought to fulfil this obligation。 The people＇2＇ mentioned by Pomponius Mela＇3＇ had no other way of discovering him but by resemblance。
Among civilised nations； the father is that person on whom the laws； by the ceremony of marriage； have fixed this duty； because they find in him the man they want。＇4＇
Among brutes this is an obligation which the mother can generally perform； but it is much more extensive among men。 Their children indeed have reason； but this comes only by slow degrees。 It is not sufficient to nourish them； we must also direct them： they can already live； but they cannot govern themselves。
Illicit conjunctions contribute but little to the propagation of the species。 The father； who is under a natural obligation to nourish and educate his children； is not then fixed； and the mother； with whom the obligation remains； finds a thousand obstacles from shame； remorse； the constraint of her sex； and the rigour of laws； and besides； she generally wants the means。
Women who have submitted to public prostitution cannot have the convenience of educating their children： the trouble of education is incompatible with their station； and they are so corrupt that they can have no protection from the law。
It follows from all this that public continence is naturally connected with the propagation of the species。
3。 Of the Condition of Children。 It is a dictate of reason that when there is a marriage； children should follow the station or condition of the father； and that when there is not； they can belong to the mother only。＇5＇
4。 Of Families。 It is almost everywhere a custom for the wife to pass into the family of the husband。 The contrary is without any inconvenience established at Formosa；＇6＇ where the husband enters into the family of the wife。
This law； which fixes the family in a succession of persons of the same sex； greatly contributes； independently of the first motives； to the propagation of the human species。 The family is a kind of property： a man who has children of a sex which does not perpetuate it is never satisfied if he has not those who can render it perpetual。
Names； whereby men acquire an idea of a thing which one would imagine ought not to perish； are extremely proper to inspire every family with a desire of extending its duration。 There are people among whom names distinguish families： there are others where they only distinguish persons： the latter have not the same advantage as the former。
5。 Of the several Orders of lawful Wives。 Laws and religion sometimes establish many kinds of civil conjunctions； and this is the case among the Mahometans； where there are several orders of wives； the children of whom are distinguished by being born in the house； by civil contracts； or even by the slavery of the mother； and the subsequent acknowledgment of the father。
It would be contrary to reason that the law should stigmatise the children for what it approved in the father。 All these children ought； therefore； to succeed； at least if some particular reason does not oppose it； as in Japan； where none inherit but the children of the wife given by the emperor。 Their policy demands that the gifts of the emperor should not be too much divided； because they subject them to a kind of service； like that of our ancient fiefs。
There are countries where a wife of the second rank enjoys nearly the same honours in a family as in our part of the world are granted to an only consort： there the children of concubines are deemed to belong to the first or principal wife。 Thus it is also established in China。 Filial respect；＇7＇ and the ceremony of deep mourning； are not due to the natural mother； but to her appointed by the law。
By means of this fiction they have no bastard children； and where such a fiction does not take place； it is obvious that a law to legitimatize the children of concubines must be considered as an act of violence； as the bulk of the nation would be stigmatised by such a decree。 Neither is there any regulation in those countries with regard to children born in adultery。 The recluse lives of women； the locks； the inclosures； and the eunuchs render all infidelity to their husbands so difficult； that the law judges it impossible。 Besides； the same sword would exterminate the mother and the child。
6。 Of Bastards in different Governments。 They have therefore no such thing as bastards where polygamy is permitted； this disgrace is known only in countries in which a man is allowed to marry but one wife。 Here they were obliged to stamp a mark of infamy upon concubinage； and consequently they were under a necessity of stigmatising the issue of such unlawful conjunctions。
In republics； where it is necessary that there should be the purest morals； bastards ought to be more degraded than in monarchies。
The laws made against them at Rome were perhaps too severe； but as the ancient institutions laid all the citizens under a necessity of marrying； and as marriages were also softened by the permission to repudiate or make a divorce； nothing but an extreme corruption of manners could lead them to concubinage。
It is observable that as the quality of a citizen was a very considerable thing in a democratic government； where it carried with it the sovereign power； they frequently made laws in respect to the state of bastards； which had less relation to the thing itself and to the honesty of marriage than to the particular constitution of the republic。 Thus the people have sometimes admitted bastards into the number of citizens； in order to increase their power in opposition to the great。＇8＇ Thus the Athenians excluded bastards from the privilege of being citizens； that they might possess a greater share of the corn sent them by the King of Egypt。 In fine； Aristotle informs us that in many cities where there was not a sufficient number of citizens； their bastards succeeded to their possessions； and that when there was a proper number； they did not inherit。＇9＇
7。 Of the Father's Consent to Marriage。 The consent of fathers is founded on their authority； that is； on the right of property。 It is also founded on their love； on their reason； and on the uncertainty of that of their children； whom youth confines in a state of ignorance and passion in a state of ebriety。
In the small republics； or singular institutions already mentioned； they might have laws which gave to magistrates that right of inspection over the marriages of the children of citizens which nature had already given to fathers。 The love of the public might there equal or surpass all other love。 Thus Plato would have marriages regulated by the magistrates： this the Laced？monian magistrates performed。
But in common institutions； fathers have the disposal of their children in marriage： their prudence in this respect is always supposed to be superior to that of a stranger。 Nature gives to fathers a desire of procuring successors to their children； when they have almost lost the desire of enjoyment themselves。 In the several degrees of progeniture； they see themselves insensibly advancing to a kind of immortality。 But what must be done； if oppression and avarice arise to such a height as to usurp all the authority of fathers？ Let us hear what Thomas Gage says in regard to the conduct of the Spaniards in the West Indies。＇10＇
〃According to the number of the sons and daughters that are marriageable； the father's tribute is raised and increased； until they provide husbands and wives for their sons and daughters； who； as soon as they are married； are charged with tribute； which； that it may increase； they will suffer none above fifteen years of age to live unmarried。 Nay； the set time of marriage appointed for the Indians is at fourteen years for the man； and thirteen for the woman； alleging that they are sooner ripe for the fruit of wedlock； and sooner ripe in knowledge and malice； and strength for work and service； than any other people。 Nay； sometimes they force those to marry who are scarcely twelve and thirteen years of age； if they find them well…limbed and strong in body； explaining a point of one of the canons； which alloweth fourteen and fifteen years。 Nisi malitia suppleat ？tatem。〃
He saw a list of these taken。 It was； says he； a most shameful affair。 Thus in an action which ought to be the most free； the Indians are the greatest slaves。
8。 The same Subject continued。 In England the law is frequently abused by the daughters marrying according to their own fancy without consulting their parents。 This custom is； I am apt to imagine； more tolerated there than anywhere else from a consideration that as the laws have not established a monastic celibacy； the daughters have no other state to choose but that of marriage； and this they cannot refuse。 In France； on the contrary； yo