按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
45。 See Leg。 9； Cod。 Theod。 De bonis proscriptorum； and Dio； lv。 See Ulpian； Fragment。； tit。 ult。； § 6； and tit。 29； § 3。
46。 Ulpian； Fragment。； tit。 16； § 1。 Sozomenus； i。 29。
47。 Book xx。 1。
48。 Book iv； tit。 8； § 3。
49。 Tit。 26； § 6。
50。 That is； the Emperor Pius who changed his name to that of Adrian by adoption。
51。 Leg。 2； Cod。 de jure liberorum。 Institutes； tit。 3； § 4； de senatus consult。 Tertul。
52。 Leg。 9； Cod。 de suis et legitimis liberis。
53。 Leg。 12； ibid。； and Nov。 118； 127。
Book XXVIII。 Of the Origin and Revolutions of the Civil Laws among the French
1。 Different Character of the Laws of the several People of Germany。 After the Franks had quitted their own country； they made a compilation of the Salic laws with the assistance of the sages of their own nation。＇1＇ The tribe of the Ripuarian Franks having joined itself under Clovis＇2＇ to that of the Salians preserved its own customs； and Theodoric；＇3＇ King of Austrasia； ordered them to be reduced to writing。 He collected likewise the customs of those Bavarians and Germans； who were dependent on his kingdom。＇4＇ For Germany having been weakened by the migration of such a multitude of people； the Franks； after conquering all before them； made a retrograde march and extended their dominion into the forests of their ancestors。 Very likely the Thuringian code was given by the same Theodoric； since the Thuringians were also his subjects。＇5＇ As the Frisians were subdued by Charles Martel and Pepin； their law cannot be prior to those princes。＇6＇ Charlemagne； the first that reduced the Saxons； gave them the law still extant； and we need only read these last two codes to be convinced they came from the hands of conquerors。 As soon as the Visigoths； the Burgundians； and the Lombards had founded their respective kingdoms； they reduced their laws to writing； not with an intent of obliging the vanquished nations to conform to their customs； but with a design of following them themselves。
There is an admirable simplicity in the Salic and Ripuarian laws； as well as in those of the Alemans； Bavarians； Thuringians； and Frisians。 They breathe an original coarseness and a spirit which no change or corruption of manners had weakened。 They received but very few alterations； because all those people； except the Franks； remained in Germany。 Even the Franks themselves laid there the foundation of a great part of their empire； so that they had none but German laws。 The same cannot be said of the laws of the Visigoths； of the Lombards and Burgundians； their character considerably altered from the great change which happened in the character of those people after they had settled in their new habitations。
The kingdom of the Burgundians did not last long enough to admit of great changes in the laws of the conquering nation。 Gundebald and Sigismond； who collected their customs； were almost the last of their kings。 The laws of the Lombards received additions rather than changes。 The laws of Rotharis were followed by those of Grimoaldus； Luitprandus； Rachis； and Astulphus； but did not assume a new form。 It was not so with the laws of the Visigoths；＇7＇ their kings new…moulded them； and had them also new…moulded by the clergy。
The kings indeed of the first race struck out of the Salic and Ripuarian laws whatever was absolutely inconsistent with Christianity； but left the main part untouched。＇8＇ This cannot be said of the laws of the Visigoths。
The laws of the Burgundians； and especially those of the Visigoths； admitted of corporal punishments； these were not tolerated by the Salic and Ripuarian laws；＇9＇ they preserved their character much better。
The Burgundians and Visigoths； whose provinces were greatly exposed； endeavoured to conciliate the affections of the ancient inhabitants； and to give them the most impartial civil laws；＇10＇ but as the Kings of the Franks had established their power； they had no such considerations。＇11＇
The Saxons； who lived under the dominion of the Franks； were of an intractable temper； and prone to revolt。 Hence we find in their laws the severities of a conqueror；＇12＇ which are not to be met with in the other codes of the laws of the barbarians。
We see the spirit of the German laws in the pecuniary punishments； and the spirit of a conqueror in those of an afflictive nature。
The crimes they commit in their own country are subject to corporal punishment； and the spirit of the German laws is followed only in the punishment of crimes committed beyond the extent of their own territory。
They are plainly told that their crimes shall meet with no mercy； and they are refused even the asylum of churches。
The bishops had an immense authority at the court of the Visigoth Kings； the most important affairs being debated in councils。 All the maxims； principles and views of the present inquisition are owing to the code of the Visigoths； and the monks have only copied against the Jews the laws formerly enacted by bishops。
In other respects the laws of Gundebald for the Burgundians seem pretty judicious； and those of Rotharis； and of the other Lombard princes； are still more so。 But the laws of the Visigoths； those for instance of Recessuinthus； Chaindasuinthus； and Egigas are puerile； ridiculous and foolish； they attain not their end； they are stuffed with rhetoric and void of sense； frivolous in the substance and bombastic in the style。
2。 That the Laws of the Barbarians were all personal。 It is a distinguishing character of these laws of the barbarians that they were not confined to a certain district； the Frank was tried by the law of the Franks； the Aleman by that of the Alemans； the Burgundian by that of the Burgundians； and the Roman by the Roman law； nay； so far were the conquerors in those days from reducing their laws to a uniform system or body； that they did not even think of becoming legislators to the people they had conquered。
The original of this I find in the manners of the Germans。 These people were parted asunder by marshes； lakes； and forests； and C？sar observes＇13＇ they were fond of such separations。 Their dread of the Romans brought about their reunion； and yet each individual among these mixed people was still to be tried by the established customs of his own nation。 Each tribe apart was free and independent； and when they came to be intermixed； the independence still continued； the country was common； the government peculiar； the territory the same； and the nations different。 The spirit of personal laws prevailed therefore among those people before ever they set out from their own homes； and they carried it with them into the conquered provinces。
We find this custom established in the formulas of Marculfus；＇14＇ in the codes of the laws of the barbarians； but chiefly in the law of the Ripuarians＇15＇ and the decrees of the kings of the first race；＇16＇ whence the capitularies on that subject in the second race were derived。＇17＇ The children followed the laws of their father；＇18＇ the wife that of her husband；＇19＇ the widow came back to her own original law；＇20＇ and the freedman was under that of his patron。＇21＇ Besides； every man could make choice of what laws he pleased； but the constitution of Lotharius I＇22＇ required that this choice should be made public。
3。 Capital Difference between the Salic Laws and those of the Visigoths and Burgundians。 We have already observed that the laws of the Burgundians and Visigoths were impartial； but it was otherwise with regard to the Salic law； for it established between the Franks and Romans the most mortifying distinctions。 When a Frank； a barbarian； or one living under the Salic law happened to be killed； a composition of 200 sols was to be paid to his relatives；＇23＇ only 100 upon the killing of a Roman proprietor；＇24＇ and no more than forty…five for a Roman tributary。 The composition for the murder of one of the king's vassals； if a Frank； was 600 sols；＇25＇ if a Roman； though the king's guest；＇26＇ only 300。＇27＇ The Salic law made therefore a cruel distinction between the Frank and Roman lord； and the Frank and Roman commoner。
Further； if a number of people were got together to assault a Frank in his house；＇28＇ and he happened to be killed； the Salic law ordained a composition of 600 sols； but if a Roman or a freedman was assaulted； only one…half that composition。＇29＇ By the same law；＇30＇ if a Roman put a Frank in irons； he was liable to a composition of 30 sols； but if a Frank had thus used a Roman； he paid only 15。 A Frank； stripped by a Roman； was entitled to the composition of 62 1/2 sols； and a Roman stripped by a Frank received only 30。 Such unequal treatment must needs have been very grievous to a Roman。
And yet a celebrated author＇31＇ forms a system of the establishment of the Franks in Gaul； on a supposition that they were the best friends of the Romans。 The Franks then； the best friends of the Romans； they who did； and they who suffered from the Romans such an infinite deal of mischief！＇32＇ The Franks； the friends of the Romans； they who； after subduing them by their arms； oppressed them in cold blood by their laws！ They were exactly the friends of the Romans as the Tartars who conquered China were the friends of the Chinese。 If some Cat