按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
7。 Different Ways of dividing the Land。 After the Goths and Burgundians had； under various pretences； penetrated into the heart of the empire； the Romans； in order to put a stop to their devastations； were obliged to provide for their subsistence。 At first they allowed them corn；＇10＇ but afterwards chose to give them lands。 The emperors； or the Roman magistrates； in their name； made particular conventions with them concerning the division of lands；＇11＇ as we find in the chronicles and in the codes of the Visigoths＇12＇ and Burgundians。＇13＇
The Franks did not follow the same plan。 In the Salic and Ripuarian laws； we find not the least vestige of any such division of lands； they had conquered the country； and so took what they pleased； making no regulations but among themselves。
Let us； therefore； distinguish between the conduct of the Burgundians and Visigoths in Gaul； of those same Visigoths in Spain； of the auxiliary troops under Augustulus and Odoacer in ltaly；＇14＇ and that of the Franks in Gaul； as also of the Vandals in Africa。＇15＇ The former entered into conventions with the ancient inhabitants； and in consequence thereof made a division of lands between them； the latter did no such thing。
8。 The same Subject continued。 What has induced some to think that the Roman lands were entirely usurped by the Barbarians is their finding in the laws of the Visigoths and the Burgundians that these two nations had two…thirds of the lands； but this they took only in certain quarters or districts assigned them。
Gundebald says； in the law of the Burgundians； that his people at their establishment had two…thirds of the lands allowed them；＇16＇ and the second supplement to this law notices that only a moiety would be allowed to those who should hereafter come to live in that country。＇17＇ Therefore； all the lands had not been divided in the beginning between the Romans and the Burgundians。
In those two regulations we meet with the same expressions in the text； consequently they explain one another； and as the latter cannot mean a universal division of lands； neither can this signification be given to the former。
The Franks acted with the same moderation as the Burgundians； they did not strip the Romans wherever they extended their conquests。 What would they have done with so much land？ They took what suited them； and left the remainder。
9。 A just Application of the Law of the Burgundians； and of that of the Visigoths； in relation to the Division of Lands。 It is to be considered that those divisions of land were not made with a tyrannical spirit； but with a view of relieving the reciprocal wants of two nations that were to inhabit the same country。
The law of the Burgundians ordains that a Burgundian shall be received in an hospitable manner by a Roman。 This is agreeable to the manners of the Germans； who； according to Tacitus；＇18＇ were the most hospitable people in the world。
By the law of the Burgundians； it is ordained that the Burgundians shall have two…thirds of the lands； and one…third of the bondmen。 In this it considered the genius of two nations； and conformed to the manner in which they procured their subsistence。 As the Burgundians kept herds and flocks； they wanted a great deal of land and few bondmen； and the Romans； from their application to agriculture； had need of less land； and of a greater number of bondmen。 The woods were equally divided； because their wants in this respect were the same。
We find in the code of the Burgundians＇19＇ that each Barbarian was placed near a Roman。 The division therefore was not general； but the Romans who gave the division were equal in number to the Burgundians who received it。 The Roman was injured least。 The Burgundians as a martial people； fond of hunting and of a pastoral life； did not refuse to accept of the fallow grounds； while the Romans kept such lands as were properest for culture： the Burgundian's flock fattened the Roman's field。
10。 Of Servitudes。 The law of the Burgundians notices＇20＇ that when those people settled in Gaul； they were allowed two…thirds of the land； and one…third of the bondmen。 The state of villainage was therefore established in that part of Gaul before it was invaded by the Burgundians。＇21＇
The law of the Burgundians； in points relating to the two nations； makes a formal distinction in both； between the nobles； the freeborn and the bondmen。＇22＇ Servitude was not therefore a thing peculiar to the Romans； nor liberty and nobility to the Barbarians。
This very same law says；＇23＇ that if a Burgundian freedman had not given a certain sum to his master； nor received a third share of a Roman； he was always supposed to belong to his master's family。 The Roman proprietor was therefore free； since he did not belong to another person's family； he was free； because his third portion was a mark of liberty。
We need only open the Salic and Ripuarian laws to be satisfied that the Romans were no more in a state of servitude among the Franks than among the other conquerors of Gaul。
The Count de Boulainvilliers is mistaken in the capital point of his system： he has not proved that the Franks made a general regulation which reduced the Romans into a kind of servitude。
As this author's work is penned without art； and as he speaks with the simplicity； frankness； and candour of that ancient nobility whence he descends； every one is capable of judging of the good things he says； and of the errors into which he has fallen。 I shall not； therefore； undertake to criticise him； I shall only observe that he had more wit than enlightenment； more enlightenment than learning； though his learning was not contemptible； for he was well acquainted with the most valuable part of our history and laws。
The Count de Boulainvilliers and the Abbé du Bos have formed two different systems； one of which seems to be a conspiracy against the commons； and the other against the nobility。 When the sun gave leave to Ph？ton to drive his chariot； he said to him； 〃If you ascend too high； you will burn the heavenly mansions； if you descend too low； you will reduce the earth to ashes； do not drive to the right； you will meet there with the constellation of the Serpent； avoid going too much to the left； you will there fall in with that of the Altar： keep in the middle。〃＇24＇
11。 The same Subject continued。 What first gave rise to the notion of a general regulation made at the time of the conquest was our meeting with an immense number of forms of servitude in France； towards the beginning of the third race； and as the continual progression of these forms of servitude was not perceived； people imagined in an age of obscurity a general law which was never framed。
Towards the commencement of the first race we meet with an infinite number of freemen； both among the Franks and the Romans； but the number of bondmen increased to that degree； that at the beginning of the third race all the husbandmen and almost all the inhabitants of towns had become bondmen：＇25＇ and whereas； at the first period； there was very nearly the same administration in the cities as among the Romans； namely； a corporation； a senate； and courts of judicature； at the other we hardly meet with anything but a lord and his bondmen。
When the Franks； Burgundians； and Goths made their several invasions； they seized upon gold； silver； movables； clothes； men； women； boys； and whatever the army could carry； the whole was brought to one place； and divided among the army。＇26＇ History shows that after the first settlement； that is； after the first devastation； they entered into an agreement with the inhabitants； and left them all their political and civil rights。 This was the law of nations in those days； they plundered everything in time of war； and granted everything in time of peace。 Were it not so； how should we find both in the Salic and Burgundian laws such a number of regulations absolutely contrary to a general servitude of the people？
But though the conquest was not immediately productive of servitude； it arose nevertheless from the same law of nations which subsisted after the conquest。＇27＇ Opposition； revolts and the taking of towns were followed by the slavery of the inhabitants。 And； not to mention the wars which the conquering nations made against one another； as there was this peculiarity among the Franks； that the different partitions of the monarchy gave rise continually to civil wars between brothers or nephews； in which this law of nations was constantly practised； servitudes； of course； became more general in France than in other countries： and this is； I believe； one of the causes of the difference between our French laws and those of Italy and Spain； in respect to the right of seigniories。
The conquest was soon over； and the law of nations then in force was productive of some servile dependences。 The custom of the same law of nations； which obtained for many ages； gave a prodigious extent to those servitudes。
Theodoric＇28＇ imagining that the people of Auvergne were not faithful to him； thus addressed the Franks of his division： 〃Follow me； and I will carry you into a country where you shall have gold； silver； captives； clothes； and flocks in abundance； and you shall remove all the people