按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
r own engagements； a duke who was to establish the military discipline； and to put himself at the head of a nation unhappily practised in making war against itself。 This power was conferred on the mayors of the palace。
The original function of the mayors of the palace was the management of the king's household。 They had afterwards； in conjunction with other officers； the political government of fiefs； and at length they obtained the sole disposal of them。＇50＇ They had also the administration of military affairs； and the command of the armies； employments necessarily connected with the other two。 In those days it was much more difficult to raise than to command the armies； and who but the dispenser of favours could have this authority？ In this martial and independent nation； it was prudent to invite rather than to compel； prudent to give away or to promise the fiefs that should happen to be vacant by the death of the possessor； prudent； in fine； to reward continually； and to raise a jealousy with regard to preferences。 It was therefore right that the person who had the superintendence of the palace should also be general of the army。
6。 Second Epoch of the Humiliation of our Kings of the first Race。 After the execution of Brunehault； the mayors were administrators of the kingdom under the sovereigns； and though they had the conduct of the war； the kings were always at the head of the armies； while the mayor and the nation fought under their command。 But the victory of Duke Pepin over Theodoric and his mayor＇51＇ completed the degradation of our princes；＇52＇ and that which Charles Martel obtained over Chilperic and his mayor Rainfroy confirmed it。＇53＇ Austrasia triumphed twice over Neustria and Burgundy； and the mayoralty of Austrasia being annexed as it were to the family of the Pepins； this mayoralty and family became greatly superior to all the rest。 The conquerors were then afraid lest some person of credit should seize the king's person； in order to excite disturbances。 For this reason they kept them in the royal palace as in a kind of prison； and once a year showed them to the people。＇54＇ There they made ordinances； but these were such as were dictated by the mayor；＇55＇ they answered ambassadors； but the mayor made the answers。 This is the time mentioned by historians of the government of the mayors over the kings whom they held in subjection。＇56＇
The extravagant passion of the nation for Pepin's family went so far that they chose one of his grandsons； who was yet an infant； for mayor；＇57＇ and put him over one Dagobert； that is； one phantom over another。
7。 Of the great Offices and Fiefs under the Mayors of the Palace。 The mayors of the palace were little disposed to establish the uncertain tenure of places and offices； for； indeed； they ruled only by the protection which in this respect they granted to the nobility。 Hence the great offices continued to be given for life； and this usage was every day more firmly established。
But I have some particular reflections to make here in respect of fiefs： I do not question but most of them became hereditary from this time。
In the treaty of Andeli；＇58＇ Gontram and his nephew Childebert engage to maintain the donations made to the vassals and churches by the kings their predecessors； and leave is given to the wives； daughters； and widows of kings to dispose by will； and in perpetuity； of whatever they hold of the exchequer。
Marculfus wrote his formularies at the time of the mayors。＇59＇ We find several in which the kings make donations both to the person and to his heirs：＇60＇ and as the formularies represent the common actions of life； they prove that part of the fiefs had become hereditary towards the end of the first race。 They were far from having in those days the idea of an unalienable demesne； this is a modern thing； which they knew neither in theory nor practice。
In proof hereof we shall presently produce positive fact； and if we can point out a time in which there were no longer any benefices for the army； nor any funds for its support； we must certainly conclude that the ancient benefices had been alienated。 The time I mean is that of Charles Martel； who founded some new fiefs； which we should carefully distinguish from those of the earliest date。
When the kings began to make grants in perpetuity； either through the corruption which crept into the government or by reason of the constitution itself； which continually obliged those princes to confer rewards； it was natural they should begin with giving the perpetuity of the fiefs； rather than of the counties。 For to deprive themselves of some acres of land was no great matter； but to renounce the right of disposing of the great offices was divesting themselves of their very power。
8。 In what Manner the Allodial Estates were changed into Fiefs。 The manner of changing an allodial estate into a fief may be seen in a formulary of Marculfus。＇61＇ The owner of the land gave it to the king； who restored it to the donor by way of usufruct； or benefice； and then the donor nominated his heirs to the king。
In order to find out the reasons which induced them thus to change the nature of the allodia； I must trace the source of the ancient privileges of our nobility； a nobility which for these eleven centuries has been enveloped with dust； with blood； and with the marks of toil。
They who were seized of fiefs enjoyed very great advantages。 The composition for the injuries done them was greater than that of freemen。 It appears by the formularies of Marculfus that it was a privilege belonging to a king's vassal； that whoever killed him should pay a composition of six hundred sous。 This privilege was established by the Salic law；＇62＇ and by that of the Ripuarians；＇63＇ and while these two laws ordained a composition of six hundred sous for the murder of a king's vassal； they gave but two hundred sous for the murder of a person freeborn； if he was a Frank or Barbarian； or a man living under； the Salic law；＇64＇ and only a hundred for a Roman。
This was not the only privilege belonging to the king's vassals。 We ought to know that when a man was summoned in court； and did not make his appearance nor obey the judge's orders； he was called before the king；＇65＇ and if he persisted in his contumacy； he was excluded from the royal protection；＇66＇ and no one was allowed to entertain him； nor even to give him a morsel of bread。 Now； if he was a person of an ordinary condition； his goods were confiscated；＇67＇ but if he was the king's vassal； they were not。＇68＇ The first by his contumacy was deemed sufficiently convicted of the crime； the second was not； the former for the smallest crimes was obliged to undergo the trial by boiling water；＇69＇ the latter was condemned to this trial only in the case of murder。＇70＇ In fine； the king's vassal could not be compelled to swear in court against another vassal。＇71＇ These privileges were continually increasing； and the Capitulary of Carloman does this honour to the king's vassals； that they should not be obliged to swear in person； but only by the mouth of their own vassals。＇72＇ Moreover； when a person； having these honours； did not repair to the army； his punishment was to abstain from flesh…meat and wine as long as he had been absent from the service； but a freeman＇73＇ who neglected to follow his count was fined sixty sous；＇74＇ and was reduced to a state of servitude till he had paid it。
It is very natural； therefore； to believe that those Franks who were not the king's vassals； and much more the Romans； became fond of entering into the state of vassalage： and that they might not be deprived of their demesnes； they devised the usage of giving their allodium to the king； of receiving it from him afterwards as a fief； and of nominating their heirs。 This usage was continued； and took place especially during the times of confusion under the second race； when every man being in want of a protector was desirous of incorporating himself with the other lords； and of entering； as it were； into the feudal monarchy； because the political no longer existed。＇75＇
This continued under the third race； as we find by several charters；＇76＇ whether they gave their allodium； and resumed it by the same act； or whether it was declared an allodium； and afterwards acknowledged as a fief。 These were called fiefs of resumption。
This does not imply that those who were seized of fiefs administered them as a prudent father of a family would； for though the freemen grew desirous of being possessed of fiefs； yet they managed this sort of estates as usufructs are managed in our days。 This is what induced Charlemagne； the most vigilant and considerate prince we ever had； to make a great many regulations in order to hinder the fiefs from being demeaned in favour of allodial estates。＇77＇ It proves only that in his time most benefices were but for life； and consequently that they took more care of the freeholds than of the benefices； and yet for all that； they did not choose rather to be the king's vassals than freemen。 They might have reasons for disposing of some particular part of a fief； but they were not willing to be stripped of their dignity likewise。
I know； likewise； that Charlemagne laments in a certain capi