按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Besides； the kingdom of Germany was not laid waste and annihilated； as it were； like that of France； by that particular kind of war with which it had been harassed by the Normans and Saracens。 There were less riches in Germany； fewer cities to plunder； less extent of coast to scour； more marshes to get over； more forests to penetrate。 As the dominions of those princes were less in danger of being ravaged and torn to pieces； they had less need of their vassals and consequently less dependence on them。 And in all probability； if the Emperors of Germany had not been obliged to be crowned at Rome； and to make continual expeditions into Italy； the fiefs would have preserved their primitive nature much longer in that country。
31。 In what Manner the Empire was transferred from the Family of Charlemagne。 The empire； which； in prejudice to the branch of Charles the Bald had been already given to the bastard line of Louis； King of Germany；＇200＇ was transferred to a foreign house by the election of Conrad； Duke of Franconia； in 912。 The reigning branch in France； being hardly able to contest a few villages； was much less in a situation to contest the empire。 We have an agreement entered into between Charles the Simple and the Emperor Henry I； who had succeeded to Conrad； It is called the Compact of Bonn。＇201＇ These two princes met in a vessel which had been placed in the middle of the Rhine； and swore eternal friendship。 They used on this occasion an excellent middle term。 Charles took the title of King of West France； and Henry that of King of East France。 Charles contracted with the King of Germany； and not with the Emperor。
32。 In what Manner the Crown of France was transferred to the House of Hugh Capet。 The inheritance of the fiefs； and the general establishment of rear…fiefs； extinguished the political and formed a feudal government。 Instead of that prodigious multitude of vassals who were formerly under the king； there were now a few only； on whom the others depended。 The kings had scarcely any longer a direct authority； a power which was to pass through so many other and through such great powers either stopped or was lost before it reached its term。 Those great vassals would no longer obey； and they even made use of their rear…vassals to withdraw their obedience。 The kings； deprived of their demesnes and reduced to the cities of Rheims and Laon； were left exposed to their mercy； the tree stretched out its branches too far； and the head was withered。 The kingdom found itself without a demesne； as the empire is at present。 The crown was； therefore； given to one of the most potent vassals。
The Normans ravaged the kingdom； they sailed in open boats or small vessels； entered the mouths of rivers； and laid the country waste on both sides。 The cities of Orleans and Paris put a stop to those plunderers； so that they could not advance farther； either on the Seine； or on the Loire。＇202＇ Hugh Capet； who was master of those cities； held in his hands the two keys of the unhappy remains of the kingdom； the crown was conferred upon him as the only person able to defend it。 It is thus the empire was afterwards given to a family whose dominions form so strong a barrier against the Turks。
The empire went from Charlemagne's family at a time when the inheritance of fiefs was established only as a mere condescendence。 It even appears that this inheritance obtained much later among the Germans than among the French；＇203＇ which was the reason that the empire； considered as a fief； was elective。 On the contrary； when the crown of France went from the family of Charlemagne； the fiefs were really hereditary in this kingdom； and the crown； as a great fief； was also hereditary。
But it is very wrong to refer to the very moment of this revolution all the changes which happened； either before or afterwards。 The whole was reduced to two events； the reigning family changed； and the crown was united to a great fief。
33。 Some Consequences of the Perpetuity of Fiefs。 From the perpetuity of fiefs it followed that the right of seniority or primogeniture was established among the French。 This right was quite unknown under the first race；＇204＇ the crown was divided among the brothers； the allodia were shared in the same manner； and as the fiefs； whether precarious or for life； were not an object of succession； there could be no partition in regard to those tenures。
Under the second race； the title of emperor； which Louis the Debonnaire enjoyed； and with which he honoured his eldest son； Lotharius； made him think of giving this prince a kind of superiority over his younger brothers。 The two kings were obliged to wait upon the emperor every year； to carry him presents； and to receive much greater from him； they were also to consult with him upon common affairs。＇205＇ This is what inspired Lotharius with those pretences which met with such bad success。 When Agobard wrote in favour of this prince；＇206＇ he alleged the emperor's own intention； who had associated Lotharius with the empire after he had consulted the Almighty by a three days' fast； by the celebration of the holy mysteries； and by prayers and almsgiving； after the nation had sworn allegiance to him； which they could not refuse without perjuring themselves； and after he had sent
Lotharius to Rome to be confirmed by the Pope。 Upon all this he lays a stress； and not upon his right of primogeniture。 He says； indeed； that the emperor had designed a partition among the younger brothers； and that he had given the preference to the elder； but saying he had preferred the elder was saying at the saine time that he might have given the preference to his younger brothers。
But as soon as the fiefs became hereditary； the right of seniority was established in the feudal succession； and for the same reason in that of the crown； which was the great fief。 The ancient law of partitions was no longer subsisting； the fiefs being charged with a service； the possessor must have been enabled to discharge it。 The law of primogeniture was established； and the right of the feudal law was superior to that of the political or civil institution。
As the fiefs descended to the children of the possessor； the lords lost the liberty of disposing of them； and； in order to indemnify themselves； they established what they called the right of redemption； whereof mention is made in our customs； which at first was paid in a direct line； and by usage came afterwards to be paid only in a collateral line。
The fiefs were soon rendered transferable to strangers as a patrimonial estate。 This gave rise to the right of lord's dues； which were established almost throughout the kingdom。 These rights were arbitrary in the beginning； but when the practice of granting such permissions became general； they were fixed in every district。
The right of redemption was to be paid at every change of heir； and at first was paid even in a direct line。＇207＇ The most general custom had fixed it to one year's income。 This was burdensome and inconvenient to the vassal； and affected in some measure the fief itself； It was often agreed in the act of homage that the lord should no longer demand more than a certain sum of money for the redemption； which； by the changes incident to money； became afterwards of no manner of importance。＇208＇ Thus the right of redemption is in our days reduced almost to nothing； while that of the lord's dues is continued in its full extent。 As this right concerned neither the vassal nor his heirs； but was a fortuitous case which no one was obliged to foresee or expect； these stipulations were not made； and they continued to pay a certain part of the price。
When the fiefs were for life； they could not give a part of a fief to hold in perpetuity as a rear…fief； for it would have been absurd that a person who had only the usufruct of a thing should dispose of the property of it。 But when they became perpetual； this was permitted。＇209＇ with some restrictions made by the customs； which was what they call dismembering their fief。＇210＇
The perpetuity of feudal tenures having established the right of redemption； the daughters were rendered capable of succeeding to a fief； in default of male issue。 For when the lord gave the fief to his daughter； he multiplied the cases of his right of redemption； because the husband was obliged to pay it as well as the wife。＇211＇ This regulation could not take place in regard to the crown； for as it was not held of any one； there could be no right of redemption over it。
The daughter of William V； Count of Toulouse； did not succeed to the county。 But Eleanor succeeded to Aquitaine； and Matilda to Normandy； and the right of the succession of females seemed so well established in those days； that Louis the Young； after his divorce from Eleanor； made no difficulty in restoring Guienne to her。 But as these two last instances followed close on the first； the general law by which the women were called to the succession of fiefs must have been introduced much later into the county of Toulouse than into the other provinces of France。＇212＇
The constitution of several kingdoms of Europe has been directed by the state of feudal tenures at the time when those kingdoms were founded。 The women succeeded ne