友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
九色书籍 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

the science of right-第7章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




juridical act on my part。 But the assumption of this act at the same

time involves the admission that I am obliged reciprocally to

observe a similar abstention towards every other in respect of what is

externally theirs; for the obligation in question arises from a

universal rule regulating the external juridical relations。 Hence I am

not obliged to let alone what another person declares to be externally

his; unless every other person likewise secures me by a guarantee that

he will act in relation to what is mine; upon the same principle。 This

guarantee of reciprocal and mutual abstention from what belongs to

others does not require a special juridical act for its establishment;

but is already involved in the conception of an external obligation of

right; on account of the universality and consequently the reciprocity

of the obligatoriness arising from a universal Rule。 Now a single

will; in relation to an external and consequently contingent

possession; cannot serve as a compulsory law for all; because that

would be to do violence to the freedom which is in accordance with

universal laws。 Therefore it is only a will that binds every one;

and as such a common; collective; and authoritative will; that can

furnish a guarantee of security to all。 But the state of men under a

universal; external; and public legislation; conjoined with

authority and power; is called the civil state。 There can therefore be

an external mine and thine only in the civil state of society。

  Consequence。… It follows; as a corollary; that; if it is juridically

possible to have an external object as one's own; the individual

subject of possession must be allowed to compel or constrain every

person with whom a dispute as to the mine or thine of such a

possession may arise; to enter along with himself into the relations

of a civil constitution。



    9。 There May; However; Be an External Mine and Thine Found as

      a Fact in the State of Nature; but it is only Provisory。



  Natural right in the state of a civil constitution means the forms

of right which may be deduced from principles a priori as the

conditions of such a constitution。 It is therefore not to be infringed

by the statutory laws of such a constitution; and accordingly the

juridical principle remains in force; that; 〃Whoever proceeds upon a

maxim by which it becomes impossible for me to have an object of the

exercise of my will as mine; does me a lesion or injury。〃 For a

civil constitution is only the juridical condition under which every

one has what is his own merely secured to him; as distinguished from

its being specially assigned and determined to him。 All guarantee;

therefore; assumes that everyone to whom a thing is secured is already

in possession of it as his own。 Hence; prior to the civil

constitution… or apart from it… an external mine and thine must be

assumed as possible; and along with it a right to compel everyone with

whom we could come into any kind of intercourse to enter with us

into a constitution in which what is mine or thine can be secured。

There may thus be a possession in expectation or in preparation for

such a state of security; as can only be established on the law of the

common will; and as it is therefore in accordance with the possibility

of such a state; it constitutes a provisory or temporary juridical

possession; whereas that possession which is found in reality in the

civil state of society will be a peremptory or guaranteed

possession。 Prior to entering into this state; for which he is

naturally prepared; the individual rightfully resists those who will

not adapt themselves to it; and who would disturb him in his provisory

possession; because; if the will of all except himself were imposing

upon him an obligation to withdraw from a certain possession; it would

still be only a one…sided or unilateral will; and consequently it

would have just as little legal title… which can be properly based

only on the universalized will… to contest a claim of right as he

would have to assert it。 Yet be has the advantage on his side; of

being in accord with the conditions requisite to the introduction

and institution of a civil form of society。 In a word; the mode in

which anything external may be held as one's own in the state of

nature; is just physical possession with a presumption of right thus

far in its favour; that by union of the wills of all in a public

legislation it will be made juridical; and in this expectation it

holds comparatively; as a kind of potential juridical possession。

  This prerogative of right; as arising from the fact of empirical

possession; is in accordance with the formula: 〃It is well for those

who are in possession〃 (Beati possidentes)。 It does not consist in the

fact that; because the possessor has the presumption of being a

rightful man; it is unnecessary for him to bring forward proof that he

possesses a certain thing rightfully; for this position applies only

to a case of disputed right。 But it is because it accords with the

postulate of the practical reason; that everyone is invested with

the faculty of having as his own any external object upon which he has

exerted his will; and; consequently; all actual possession is a

state whose rightfulness is established upon that postulate by an

anterior act of will。 And such an act; if there be no prior possession

of the same object by another opposed to it; does; therefore;

provisionally justify and entitle me; according to the law of external

freedom; to restrain anyone who refuses to enter with me into a

state of public legal freedom from all pretension to the use of such

an object。 For such a procedure is requisite; in conformity with the

postulate of reason; in order to subject to my proper use a thing

which would otherwise be practically annihilated; as regards all

proper use of it。

CH2

                  FIRST PART。 PRIVATE RIGHT。

  The System of those Laws Which Require No External Promulgation。

      CHAPTER II。 The Mode of Acquiring Anything External。



       10。 The General Principle of External Acquisition。



  I acquire a thing when I act (efficio) so that it becomes mine。 An

external thing is originally mine when it is mine even without the

intervention of a juridical act。 An acquisition is original and

primary when it is not derived from what another had already made

his own。

  There is nothing external that is as such originally mine; but

anything external may be originally acquired when it is an object that

no other person has yet made his。 A state in which the mine and

thine are in common cannot be conceived as having been at any time

original。 Such a state of things would have to be acquired by an

external juridical act; although there may be an original and common

possession of an external object。 Even if we think hypothetically of a

state in which the mine and thine would be originally in common as a

communio mei et tui originaria; it would still have to be

distinguished from a primeval communion (communio primaeva) with

things in common; sometimes supposed to be founded in the first period

of the relations of right among men; and which could not be regarded

as based upon principles like the former; but only upon history。

Even under that condition the historic communio; as a supposed

primeval community; would always have to be viewed as acquired and

derivative (communio derivativa)。

  The principle of external acquisition; then; may be expressed

thus: 〃Whatever I bring under my power according to the law of

external freedom; of which as an object of my free activity of will

I have the capability of making use according to the postulate of

the practical reason; and which I will to become mine in conformity

with the idea of a possible united common will; is mine。〃

  The practical elements (momenta attendenda) constitutive of the

process of original acquisition are:

  1。 Prehension or seizure of an object which belongs to no one;

for; if it belonged already to some one; the act would conflict with

the freedom of others; that is; according to universal laws。 This is

the taking possession of an object of my free activity of will in

space and time; the possession; therefore; into which I thus put

myself is sensible or physical possession (possessio phenomenon);

  2。 Declaration of the possession of this object by formal

designation and the act of my freewill in interdicting every other

person from using it as his;

  3。 Appropriation; as the act; in idea; of an externally

legislative common will; by which all and each are obliged to

respect and act in conformity with my act of will。

  The validity of the last element in the process of acquisition; as

that on which the conclusion that 〃the external object is mine〃 rests;

is what makes the possession valid as a purely rational and

juridical possession (possessio noumenon)。 It is founded upon the fact

that; as all these acts are jur
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!