按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
temptation and with all the bias of a sinful natureis infinite。
Nothing which a created mortal can do is infinite； it is only
finite： the infinite belongs to God alone。 Hence an infinite
penalty for a finite sin conflicts with consciousness and is
nowhere asserted in the Bible； which is transcendently more
merciful and comforting than many theological systems of belief；
however powerfully sustained by dialectical reasoning and by the
most excellent men。 Human judgments or reasonings are fallible on
moral questions which have two sides； and reasonings from texts
which present different meanings when studied by the lights of
learning and science are still more liable to be untrustworthy。 It
would seem to be the supremest necessity for theological schools to
unravel the meaning of divine declarations； and present doctrines
in their relation with apparently conflicting texts； rather than
draw out a perfect and consistent system； philosophically
considered； from any one class of texts。 Of all things in this
wicked and perplexing world the science of theology should be the
most cheerful and inspiring； for it involves inquiries on the
loftiest subjects which can interest a thoughtful mind。
But whatever defects the system of doctrines which Calvin
elaborated with such transcendent ability may have； there is no
question as to its vast influence on the thinking of the sixteenth
and seventeenth centuries。 The schools of France and Holland and
Scotland and England and America were animated by his genius and
authority。 He was a burning and a shining light； if not for all
ages； at least for the unsettled times in which he lived。 No
theologian ever had a greater posthumous power than he for nearly
three hundred years； and he is still one of the great authorities
of the church universal。 John Knox sought his counsel and was
influenced by his advice in the great reform he made in Scotland。
In France the words Calvinist and Huguenot are synonymous。
Cranmer； too； listened to his counsels； and had great respect for
his learning and sanctity。 Among the Puritans he has reigned like
an oracle。 Oliver Cromwell embraced his doctrines； as also did Sir
Matthew Hale。 Ridicule or abuse of Calvin is as absurd as the
ridicule or abuse with which Protestants so long assailed
Hildebrand or Innocent III。 No one abuses Pascal or Augustine； and
yet the theological views of all these are substantially the same。
In one respect I think that Calvin has received more credit than he
deserves。 Some have maintained that he was a sort of father of
republicanism and democratic liberty。 In truth he had no popular
sympathies； and leaned towards an aristocracy which was little
short of an oligarchy。 He had no hand in establishing the
political system of Geneva； it was established before he went
there。 He was not even one of those thinkers who sympathized with
true liberty of conscience。 He persecuted heretics like a
mediaeval Catholic divine。 He would have burned a Galileo as he
caused the death of Servetus； which need not have happened but for
him。 Calvin could have saved Servetus if he had pleased； but he
complained of him to the magistrates； knowing that his condemnation
and death would necessarily follow。 He had neither the humanity of
Luther nor the toleration of Saint Augustine。 He was the
impersonation of intellect；like Newton； Leibnitz； Spinoza； and
Kant；which overbore the impulses of his heart。 He had no
passions except zeal for orthodoxy。 So pre…eminently did intellect
tower above the passions that he seemed to lack sympathy； and yet；
such was his exalted character； he was capable of friendship。 He
was remarkable for every faculty of the mind except wit and
imagination。 His memory was almost incredible； he remembered
everything he ever read or heard； he would； after long intervals；
recognize persons whom he had never seen but once or twice。 When
employed in dictation； he would resume the thread of his discourse
without being prompted； after the most vexatious interruptions。
His judgment was as sound as his memory was retentive； it was
almost infallible；no one was ever known to have been misled by
it。 He had a remarkable analytical power； and also the power of
generalization。 He was a very learned man； and his Commentaries
are among the most useful and valued of his writings； showing both
learning and judgment； his exegetical works have scarcely been
improved。 He had no sceptical or rationalistic tendencies； and
therefore his Commentaries may not be admired by men of 〃advanced
thought；〃 but his annotations will live when those of Ewald shall
be forgotten； they still hold their place in the libraries of
biblical critics。 For his age he was a transcendent critic； his
various writings fill five folio volumes。 He was not so voluminous
a writer as Thomas Aquinas； but less diffuse； his style is lucid；
like that of Voltaire。
Considering the weakness of his body Calvin's labors were
prodigious。 There was never a more industrious man； finding time
for everything；for an amazing correspondence； for pastoral
labors； for treatises and essays； for commentaries and official
duties。 No man ever accomplished more in the same space of time。
He preached daily every alternate week； he attended meetings of the
Consistory and of the Court of Morals； he interested himself in the
great affairs of his age； he wrote letters to all parts of
Christendom。
Reigning as a religious dictator； and with more influence than any
man of his age； next to Luther； Calvin was content to remain poor；
and was disdainful of money and all praises and rewards。 This was
not an affectation； not the desire to imitate the great saints of
Christian antiquity to whom poverty was a cardinal virtue； but real
indifference； looking upon money as impedimenta； as camp equipage
is to successful generals。 He was not conscious of being poor with
his small salary of fifty dollars a year； feeling that he had
inexhaustible riches within him； and hence he calmly and naturally
took his seat among the great men of the world as their peer and
equal； without envy of the accidents of fortune and birth。 He was
as indifferent to money and luxuries as Socrates when he walked
barefooted among the Athenian aristocracy； or Basil when he retired
to the wilderness； he rarely gave vent to extravagant grief or joy；
seldom laughed； and cared little for hilarities； he knew no games
or sports； he rarely played with children or gossiped with women；
he loved without romance； and suffered bereavement without outward
sorrow。 He had no toleration for human infirmities； and was
neither social nor genial； he sought a wife； not so much for
communion of feeling as to ease him of his burdens；not to share
his confidence； but to take care of his house。 Nor was he fond；
like Luther； of music and poetry。 He had no taste for the fine
arts； he never had a poet or an artist for his friend or companion。
He could not look out of his window without seeing the glaciers of
the Alps； but seemed to be unmoved by their unspeakable grandeur；
he did not revel in the glories of nature or art； but gave his mind
to abstract ideas and stern practical duties。 He was sparing of
language； simple； direct； and precise； using neither sarcasm； nor
ridicule； nor exaggeration。 He was far from being eloquent
according to popular notions of oratory； and despised the jingle of
words and phrases and tricks of rhetoric； he appealed to reason
rather than the passions； to the conscience rather than the
imagination。
Though mild； Calvin was also intolerant。 Castillo； once his
friend； assailed his doctrine of Decrees； and was obliged to quit
Geneva； and was so persecuted that he died of actual starvation；
Perrin； captain…general of the republic； danced at a wedding； and
was thrown into prison； Bolsec； an eminent physician； opposed the
doctrine of Predestination； and was sentenced to perpetual
imprisonment； Gruet spoke lightly of the ordinances of religion；
and was beheaded； Servetus was a moral and learned and honest man；
but could not escape the flames。 Had he been willing to say； as
the flames consumed his body； 〃Jesus； thou eternal Son of God； have
mercy on me！〃 instead of； 〃Jesus； thou son of the eternal God！〃 he
might have been spared。 Calvin was as severe on those who refused
to accept his logical deductions from acknowledged truths as he was
on those who denied the fundamental truths themselves。 But
toleration was rare in his age； and he was not beyond it。 He was
not even beyond the ideas of the Middle Ages in some important
points； such as those which pertained to divine justice；the wrath
rather than the love of God。 He lived too near the Middle Ages to
be emancipated from the ideas which enslaved such a man as Thomas
Aquinas。 He had very little patience with frivolous amusements or
degrading pursuits。 He attached great di