按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
sovereign； the state would have become simply a monarchy； only differing
from other monarchies in the fact； that the latter are； or should be；
carried on in accordance with God's decree； unknown even to the monarch；
whereas the Hebrew monarch would have been the only person to whom the
decree was revealed。 （63） A difference which increases； rather than
diminishes the monarch's authority。 （64） As far as the people in both cases
are concerned； each would be equally subject； and equally ignorant of
the Divine decree； for each would be dependent on the monarch's words； and
would learn from him alone； what was lawful or unlawful： nor would the fact
that the people believed that the monarch was only issuing commands in
accordance with God's decree revealed to him； make it less in subjection；
but rather more。 ＇17：6＇ （65） However； Moses elected no such successor； but
left the dominion to those who came after him in a condition which could not
be called a popular government； nor an aristocracy； nor a monarchy； but a
Theocracy。 （66） For the right of interpreting laws was vested in one man；
while the right and power of administering the state according to the
laws thus interpreted； was vested in another man （see Numb。 xxvii：21）
＇Endnote 31＇。
（17：67） In order that the question may be thoroughly understood； I will duly
set forth the administration of the whole state。
（68） First； the people were commanded to build a tabernacle； which should
be； as it were； the dwelling of God … that is； of the sovereign authority of
the state。 （69） This tabernacle was to be erected at the cost of the whole
people； not of one man； in order that the place where God was consulted
might be public property。 （70） The Levites were chosen as courtiers and
administrators of this royal abode； while Aaron； the brother of Moses； was
chosen to be their chief and second； as it were； to God their King； being
succeeded in the office by his legitimate sons。
（17：71） He； as the nearest to God； was the sovereign interpreter of the
Divine laws； he communicated the answers of the Divine oracle to the people；
and entreated God's favour for them。 （72） If； in addition to these
privileges； he had possessed the right of ruling； he would have been neither
more nor less than an absolute monarch； but； in respect to government； he
was only a private citizen： the whole tribe of Levi was so completely
divested of governing rights that it did not even take its share with the
others in the partition of territory。 （73） Moses provided for its support by
inspiring the common people with great reverence for it； as the only tribe
dedicated to God。
（17：74） Further； the army； formed from the remaining twelve tribes； was
commanded to invade the land of Canaan； to divide it into twelve portions；
and to distribute it among the tribes by lot。 （75） For this task twelve
captains were chosen； one from every tribe； and were； together with
Joshua and Eleazar； the high priest； empowered to divide the land into
twelve equal parts； and distribute it by lot。 （76） Joshua was chosen for the
chief command of the army； inasmuch as none but he had the right to consult
God in emergencies； not like Moses； alone in his tent； or in the
tabernacle； but through the high priest； to whom only the answers of God
were revealed。 （77） Furthermore； he was empowered to execute； and cause the
people to obey God's commands； transmitted through the high priests； to
find； and to make use of； means for carrying them out； to choose as many；
army captains as he liked； to make whatever choice he thought best； to
send ambassadors in his own name； and； in short； to have the entire control
of the war。 （78） To his office there was no rightful successor … indeed； the
post was only filled by the direct order of the Deity； on occasions of
public emergency。 （79） In ordinary times； all the management of peace and
war was vested in the captains of the tribes； as I will shortly point out。
（80） Lastly； all men between the ages of twenty and sixty were ordered to
bear arms； and form a citizen army； owing allegiance； not to its general…in…
chief； nor to the high priest； but to Religion and to God。 （81） The army； or
the hosts； were called the army of God； or the hosts of God。 （82） For this
reason God was called by the Hebrews the God of Armies； and the ark of the
covenant was borne in the midst of the army in important battles； when the
safety or destruction of the whole people hung upon the issue； so that the
people might； as it were； see their King among them； and put forth all their
strength。
（17：83） From these directions； left by Moses to his successors； we plainly
see that he chose administrators； rather than despots； to come after him；
for he invested no one with the power of consulting God； where he liked and
alone； consequently； no one had the power possessed by himself of ordaining
and abrogating laws； of deciding on war or peace； of choosing men to fill
offices both religious and secular： all these are the prerogatives of a
sovereign。 （84） The high priest； indeed； had the right of interpreting laws；
and communicating the answers of God； but he could not do so when he liked；
as Moses could； but only when he was asked by the general…in…chief of the
army； the council； or some similar authority。 （85） The general…in…chief and
the council could consult God when they liked； but could only receive His
answers through the high priest； so that the utterances of God； as reported
by the high priest； were not decrees； as they were when reported by Moses；
but only answers； they were accepted by Joshua and the council； and only
then had the force of commands and decrees ｛Like the separation of powers in
the United States of America。｝
（17：86） The high priest； both in the case of Aaron and of his son Eleazar；
was chosen by Moses； nor had anyone； after Moses' death； a right to elect to
the office； which became hereditary 。 （87） The general…in…chief of the army
was also chosen by Moses； and assumed his functions in virtue of the
commands； not of the high priest； but of Moses： indeed； after the death of
Joshua； the high priest did not appoint anyone in his place； and the
captains did not consult God afresh about a general…in…chief； but each
retained Joshua's power in respect to the contingent of his own tribe；
and all retained it collectively； in respect to the whole army。 （88） There
seems to have been no need of a general…in…chief； except when they were
obliged to unite their forces against a common enemy。 （89） This occurred
most frequently during the time of Joshua； when they had no fixed dwelling。
place； and possessed all things in common。 ＇17：7＇ （90） After all the tribes
had gained their territories by right of conquest； and had divided their
allotted gains； they； became separated； having no longer their possessions
in common； so that the need for a single commander ceased； for the
different tribes should be considered rather in the light of confederated
states than of bodies of fellow…citizens。 （91） In respect to their God and
their religion； they； were fellow…citizens； but； in respect to the rights
which one possessed with regard to another； they were only confederated：
they； were； in fact； in much the same position （if one excepts the Temple
common to all） as the United States of the Netherlands ｛or United States of
America｝。 （92） The division of property； held in common is only another
phrase for the possession of his share by each of the owners singly； and the
surrender by the others of their rights over such share。 （93） This is why
Moses elected captains of the tribes … namely； that when the dominion was
divided； each might take care of his own part； consulting God through the
high priest on the affairs of his tribe； ruling over his army； building and
fortifying cities； appointing judges； attacking the enemies of his own
dominion； and having complete control over all civil and military affairs。
（94） He was not bound to acknowledge any superior judge save God
＇Endnote 32＇； or a prophet whom God should expressly send。 （95） If he
departed from the worship of God； the rest of the tribes did not arraign him
as a subject； but attacked him as an enemy。 （95） Of this we have examples in
Scripture。 （96） When Joshua was dead； the children of Israel （not a fresh
general…in…chief） consulted God； it being decided that the tribe of Judah
should be the first to attack its enemies； the tribe in question contracted
a single alliance with the tribe of Simeon； for uniting their forces； and
attacking their common enemy； the rest of the tribes not being included in
the alliance （Judges i：1； 2； 3）。 （97） Each tribe separately made war against
its own enemi