按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
obstacle opposes itself。 Therefore they cannot be applied to the Divine will。 There is something so singular in the unbounded esteem for the pure moral law； apart from all advantage； as it is presented for our obedience by practical reason； the voice of which makes even the boldest sinner tremble and compels him to hide himself from it； that we cannot wonder if we find this influence of a mere intellectual idea on the feelings quite incomprehensible to speculative reason and have to be satisfied with seeing so much of this a priori that such a feeling is inseparably connected with the conception of the moral law in every finite rational being。 If this feeling of respect were pathological； and therefore were a feeling of pleasure based on the inner sense； it would be in vain to try to discover a connection of it with any idea a priori。 But ＇it＇ is a feeling that applies merely to what is practical； and depends on the conception of a law； simply as to its form； not on account of any object； and therefore cannot be reckoned either as pleasure or pain； and yet produces an interest in obedience to the law； which we call the moral interest； just as the capacity of taking such an interest in the law （or respect for the moral law itself） is properly the moral feeling。 The consciousness of a free submission of the will to the law； yet combined with an inevitable constraint put upon all inclinations； though only by our own reason； is respect for the law。 The law that demands this respect and inspires it is clearly no other than the moral （for no other precludes all inclinations from exercising any direct influence on the will）。 An action which is objectively practical according to this law； to the exclusion of every determining principle of inclination； is duty； and this by reason of that exclusion includes in its concept practical obligation； that is； a determination to actions； however reluctantly they may be done。 The feeling that arises from the consciousness of this obligation is not pathological； as would be a feeling produced by an object of the senses； but practical only； that is； it is made possible by a preceding （objective） determination of the will and a causality of the reason。 As submission to the law； therefore； that is； as a command （announcing constraint for the sensibly affected subject）； it contains in it no pleasure； but on the contrary； so far； pain in the action。 On the other hand； however； as this constraint is exercised merely by the legislation of our own reason； it also contains something elevating； and this subjective effect on feeling； inasmuch as pure practical reason is the sole cause of it； may be called in this respect self…approbation； since we recognize ourselves as determined thereto solely by the law without any interest； and are now conscious of a quite different interest subjectively produced thereby； and which is purely practical and free； and our taking this interest in an action of duty is not suggested by any inclination； but is commanded and actually brought about by reason through the practical law； whence this feeling obtains a special name； that of respect。 The notion of duty； therefore； requires in the action； objectively； agreement with the law； and； subjectively in its maxim； that respect for the law shall be the sole mode in which the will is determined thereby。 And on this rests the distinction between the consciousness of having acted according to duty and from duty； that is； from respect for the law。 The former （legality） is possible even if inclinations have been the determining principles of the will； but the latter （morality）； moral worth； can be placed only in this； that the action is done from duty； that is； simply for the sake of the law。*
*If we examine accurately the notion of respect for persons as it has been already laid down； we shall perceive that it always rests on the consciousness of a duty which an example shows us； and that respect； therefore。 can never have any but a moral ground； and that it is very good and even； in a psychological point of view； very useful for the knowledge of mankind； that whenever we use this expression we should attend to this secret and marvellous； yet often recurring； regard which men in their judgement pay to the moral law。
It is of the greatest importance to attend with the utmost exactness in all moral judgements to the subjective principle of all maxims； that all the morality of actions may be placed in the necessity of acting from duty and from respect for the law； not from love and inclination for that which the actions are to produce。 For men and all created rational beings moral necessity is constraint； that is obligation； and every action based on it is to be conceived as a duty； not as a proceeding previously pleasing； or likely to be Pleasing to us of our own accord。 As if indeed we could ever bring it about that without respect for the law； which implies fear； or at least apprehension of transgression； we of ourselves； like the independent Deity； could ever come into possession of holiness of will by the coincidence of our will with the pure moral law becoming as it were part of our nature； never to be shaken （in which case the law would cease to be a command for us； as we could never be tempted to be untrue to it）。 The moral law is in fact for the will of a perfect being a law of holiness； but for the will of every finite rational being a law of duty； of moral constraint； and of the determination of its actions by respect for this law and reverence for its duty。 No other subjective principle must be assumed as a motive； else while the action might chance to be such as the law prescribes； yet； as does not proceed from duty； the intention； which is the thing properly in question in this legislation； is not moral。 It is a very beautiful thing to do good to men from love to them and from sympathetic good will； or to be just from love of order； but this is not yet the true moral maxim of our conduct which is suitable to our position amongst rational beings as men； when we pretend with fanciful pride to set ourselves above the thought of duty； like volunteers； and； as if we were independent on the command； to want to do of our own good pleasure what we think we need no command to do。 We stand under a discipline of reason and in all our maxims must not forget our subjection to it； nor withdraw anything therefrom； or by an egotistic presumption diminish aught of the authority of the law （although our own reason gives it） so as to set the determining principle of our will； even though the law be conformed to； anywhere else but in the law itself and in respect for this law。 Duty and obligation are the only names that we must give to our relation to the moral law。 We are indeed legislative members of a moral kingdom rendered possible by freedom； and presented to us by reason as an object of respect； but yet we are subjects in it； not the sovereign； and to mistake our inferior position as creatures； and presumptuously to reject the authority of the moral law； is already to revolt from it in spirit； even though the letter of it is fulfilled。 With this agrees very well the possibility of such a command as： Love God above everything； and thy neighbour as thyself。* For as a command it requires respect for a law which commands love and does not leave it to our own arbitrary choice to make this our principle。 Love to God； however； considered as an inclination （pathological love）； is impossible； for He is not an object of the senses。 The same affection towards men is possible no doubt； but cannot be commanded； for it is not in the power of any man to love anyone at command； therefore it is only practical love that is meant in that pith of all laws。 To love God means； in this sense； to like to do His commandments； to love one's neighbour means to like to practise all duties towards him。 But the command that makes this a rule cannot command us to have this disposition in actions conformed to duty； but only to endeavour after it。 For a command to like to do a thing is in itself contradictory； because if we already know of ourselves what we are bound to do； and if further we are conscious of liking to do it； a command would be quite needless； and if we do it not willingly； but only out of respect for the law； a command that makes this respect the motive of our maxim would directly counteract the disposition commanded。 That law of all laws； therefore； like all the moral precepts of the Gospel； exhibits the moral disposition in all its perfection； in which； viewed as an ideal of holiness； it is not attainable by any creature； but yet is the pattern which we should strive to approach； and in an uninterrupted but infinite progress become like to。 In fact； if a rational creature could ever reach this point； that he thoroughly likes to do all moral laws； this would mean that there does not exist in him even the possibility of a desire that would tempt him to deviate from them； for to overcome such a desire always costs the subject some sacrifice and therefore requires self…compulsion； that is； inward constraint to something that one does not quite like to do； and no creature can ever reach this stage of moral disposition。 For； being a creature；