按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
that this part of the germ…plasm serves as a foundation from which
the germ…cells of the new organism are produced。 There is；
therefore； continuity of the germ…plasm from one generation to
another。 One might represent the germ…plasm by the metaphor of a
long creeping root…stock from which plants arise at intervals； these
latter representing the individuals of successive generations。〃 ｛31｝
Mr。 Wallace； who does not appear to have read Professor Weismann's
essays themselves； but whose remarks are； no doubt； ultimately
derived from the sequel to the passage just quoted from page 266 of
Professor Weismann's book； contends that the impossibility of the
transmission of acquired characters follows as a logical result from
Professor Weismann's theory； inasmuch as the molecular structure of
the germ…plasm that will go to form any succeeding generation is
already predetermined within the still unformed embryo of its
predecessor； 〃and Weismann；〃 continues Mr。 Wallace； 〃holds that
there are no facts which really prove that acquired characters can
be inherited； although their inheritance has； by most writers； been
considered so probable as hardly to stand in need of direct proof。〃
｛32｝
Professor Weismann； in passages too numerous to quote； shows that he
recognises this necessity； and acknowledges that the non…
transmission of acquired characters 〃forms the foundation of the
views〃 set forth in his book； p。 291。
Professor Ray Lankester does not commit himself absolutely to this
view； but lends it support by saying （Nature； December 12； 1889）：
〃It is hardly necessary to say that it has never yet been shown
experimentally that ANYTHING acquired by one generation is
transmitted to the next （putting aside diseases）。〃
Mr。 Romanes； writing in Nature； March 18； 1890； and opposing certain
details of Professor Weismann's theory； so far supports it as to say
that 〃there is the gravest possible doubt lying against the
supposition that any really inherited decrease is due to the
inherited effects of disuse。〃 The 〃gravest possible doubt〃 should
mean that Mr。 Romanes regards it as a moral certainty that disuse
has no transmitted effect in reducing an organ； and it should follow
that he holds use to have no transmitted effect in its development。
The sequel； however； makes me uncertain how far Mr。 Romanes intends
this； and I would refer the reader to the article which Mr。 Romanes
has just published on Weismann in the Contemporary Review for this
current month。
The burden of Mr。 Thiselton Dyer's controversy with the Duke of
Argyll （see Nature； January 16； 1890； et seq。） was that there was no
evidence in support of the transmission of any acquired
modification。 The orthodoxy of science； therefore； must be held as
giving at any rate a provisional support to Professor Weismann； but
all of them； including even Professor Weismann himself； shrink from
committing themselves to the opinion that the germ…cells of any
organisms remain in all cases unaffected by the events that occur to
the other cells of the same organism； and until they do this they
have knocked the bottom out of their case。
From among the passages in which Professor Weismann himself shows a
desire to hedge I may take the following from page 170 of his book：…
〃I am also far from asserting that the germ…plasm which； as I hold；
is transmitted as the basis of heredity from one generation to
another； is absolutely unchangeable or totally uninfluenced by
forces residing in the organism within which it is transformed into
germ…cells。 I am also compelled to admit it as conceivable that
organisms may exert a modifying influence upon their germ…cells； and
even that such a process is to a certain extent inevitable。 The
nutrition and growth of the individual must exercise some influence
upon its germ…cells 。 。 。 〃
Professor Weismann does indeed go on to say that this influence must
be extremely slight； but we do not care how slight the changes
produced may be provided they exist and can be transmitted。 On an
earlier page （p。 101） he said in regard to variations generally that
we should not expect to find them conspicuous； their frequency would
be enough； if they could be accumulated。 The same applies here； if
stirring events that occur to the somatic cells can produce any
effect at all on offspring。 A very small effect； provided it can be
repeated and accumulated in successive generations； is all that even
the most exacting Lamarckian will ask for。
Having now made the reader acquainted with the position taken by the
leading Charles…Darwinian authorities； I will return to Professor
Weismann himself； who declares that the transmission of acquired
characters 〃at first sight certainly seems necessary；〃 and that 〃it
appears rash to attempt to dispense with its aid。〃 He continues：…
〃Many phenomena only appear to be intelligible if we assume the
hereditary transmission of such acquired characters as the changes
which we ascribe to the use or disuse of particular organs； or to
the direct influence of climate。 Furthermore； how can we explain
instinct as hereditary habit； unless it has gradually arisen by the
accumulation； through heredity； of habits which were practised in
succeeding generations？〃 ｛33｝
I may say in passing that Professor Weismann appears to suppose that
the view of instinct just given is part of the Charles…Darwinian
system； for on page 889 of his book he says 〃that many observers had
followed Darwin in explaining them ＇instincts＇ as inherited habits。〃
This was not Mr。 Darwin's own view of the matter。 He wrote：…
〃If we suppose any habitual action to become inheritedand I think
it can be shown that this does sometimes happenthen the
resemblance between what originally was a habit and an instinct
becomes so close as not to be distinguished。 。 。 But it would be the
most serious error to suppose that the greater number of instincts
have been acquired by habit in one generation； and then transmitted
by inheritance to succeeding generations。 It can be clearly shown
that the most wonderful instincts with which we are acquainted；
namely； those of the hive…bee and of many ants； could not possibly
have been thus acquired。〃＇〃Origin of Species；〃 ed。； 1859； p。 209。＇
Again we read： 〃Domestic instincts are sometimes spoken of as
actions which have become inherited solely from long…continued and
compulsory habit； but this； I think； is not true。〃Ibid。； p。 214。
Again： 〃I am surprised that no one has advanced this demonstrative
case of neuter insects； against the well…known doctrine of inherited
habit； as advanced by Lamarck。〃＇〃Origin of Species；〃 ed。 1872； p。
283。＇
I am not aware that Lamarck advanced the doctrine that instinct is
inherited habit； but he may have done so in some work that I have
not seen。
It is true； as I have more than once pointed out； that in the later
editions of the 〃Origin of Species〃 it is no longer 〃the MOST
serious〃 error to refer instincts generally to inherited habit； but
it still remains 〃a serious error；〃 and this slight relaxation of
severity does not warrant Professor Weismann in ascribing to Mr。
Darwin an opinion which he emphatically condemned。 His tone；
however； is so offhand； that those who have little acquaintance with
the literature of evolution would hardly guess that he is not much
better informed on this subject than themselves。
Returning to the inheritance of acquired characters； Professor
Weismann says that this has never been proved either by means of
direct observation or by experiment。 〃It must be admitted；〃 he
writes； 〃that there are in existence numerous descriptions of cases
which tend to prove that such mutilations as the loss of fingers；
the scars of wounds； &c。； are inherited by the offspring； but in
these descriptions the previous history is invariably obscure； and
hence the evidence loses all scientific value。〃
The experiments of M。 Brown…Sequard throw so much light upon the
question at issue that I will quote at some length from the summary
given by Mr。 Darwin in his 〃Variation of Animals and Plants under
Domestication。〃 ｛34｝ Mr。 Darwin writes：…
〃With respect to the inheritance of structures mutilated by injuries
or altered by disease； it was until lately difficult to come to any
definite conclusion。〃 ＇Then follow several cases in which
mutilations practised for many generations are not found to be
transmitted。＇ 〃Notwithstanding；〃 continues Mr。 Darwin； 〃the above
several negative cases； we now possess conclusive evidence that the
effects of operations are sometimes inherited。 Dr。 Brown…Sequard
gives the following summary of his observations on guinea…pigs； and
this summary is so important that I will quote the whole：…
〃'1st。 Appearance of epilepsy in animals born of parents having
been rendered epileptic by an injury to the spinal cord。
〃'2nd。 Appearance of epilepsy also in animals born of parents
having been rendered epileptic by the section of the sciatic nerve。
〃'3rd。 A change in the shape of the ear in animals born of parents
in which such a change was the effect of a division of the cervical
sympathetic nerve。
〃'4th。 Partial closure of the eyelids in animals b