按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
functions which had always belonged solely to the individual。
When capitalistic production has attained its maximum development；
it must confront a dividing of the ways； and the strength of capital
on the one hand； and the education and wisdom of the workers on the
other； will determine which path society is to travel。 It is
possible； considering the inertia of the masses； that the whole
world might in time come to be dominated by a group of industrial
oligarchies； or by one great oligarchy； but it is not probable。
That sporadic oligarchies may flourish for definite periods of time
is highly possible； that they may continue to do so is as highly
improbable。 The procession of the ages has marked not only the rise
of man； but the rise of the common man。 From the chattel slave； or
the serf chained to the soil； to the highest seats in modern
society； he has risen； rung by rung； amid the crumbling of the
divine right of kings and the crash of falling sceptres。 That he
has done this； only in the end to pass into the perpetual slavery of
the industrial oligarch； is something at which his whole past cries
in protest。 The common man is worthy of a better future； or else he
is not worthy of his past。
NOTE。The above article was written as long ago as 1898。 The only
alteration has been the bringing up to 1900 of a few of its
statistics。 As a commercial venture of an author； it has an
interesting history。 It was promptly accepted by one of the leading
magazines and paid for。 The editor confessed that it was 〃one of
those articles one could not possibly let go of after it was once in
his possession。〃 Publication was voluntarily promised to be
immediate。 Then the editor became afraid of its too radical nature；
forfeited the sum paid for it； and did not publish it。 Nor； offered
far and wide； could any other editor of bourgeois periodicals be
found who was rash enough to publish it。 Thus； for the first time；
after seven years； it appears in print。
A REVIEW
Two remarkable books are Ghent's 〃Our Benevolent Feudalism〃 ｛7｝ and
Brooks's 〃The Social Unrest。〃 ｛8｝ In these two books the opposite
sides of the labor problem are expounded； each writer devoting
himself with apprehension to the side he fears and views with
disfavor。 It would appear that they have set themselves the task of
collating； as a warning； the phenomena of two counter social forces。
Mr。 Ghent； who is sympathetic with the socialist movement； follows
with cynic fear every aggressive act of the capitalist class。 Mr。
Brooks； who yearns for the perpetuation of the capitalist system as
long as possible； follows with grave dismay each aggressive act of
the labor and socialist organizations。 Mr。 Ghent traces the
emasculation of labor by capital； and Mr。 Brooks traces the
emasculation of independent competing capital by labor。 In short；
each marshals the facts of a side in the two sides which go to make
a struggle so great that even the French Revolution is insignificant
beside it； for this later struggle； for the first time in the
history of struggles； is not confined to any particular portion of
the globe； but involves the whole of it。
Starting on the assumption that society is at present in a state of
flux； Mr。 Ghent sees it rapidly crystallizing into a status which
can best be described as something in the nature of a benevolent
feudalism。 He laughs to scorn any immediate realization of the
Marxian dream； while Tolstoyan utopias and Kropotkinian communistic
unions of shop and farm are too wild to merit consideration。 The
coming status which Mr。 Ghent depicts is a class domination by the
capitalists。 Labor will take its definite place as a dependent
class； living in a condition of machine servitude fairly analogous
to the land servitude of the Middle Ages。 That is to say； labor
will be bound to the machine； though less harshly； in fashion
somewhat similar to that in which the earlier serf was bound to the
soil。 As he says； 〃Bondage to the land was the basis of villeinage
in the old regime； bondage to the job will be the basis of
villeinage in the new。〃
At the top of the new society will tower the magnate； the new feudal
baron； at the bottom will be found the wastrels and the
inefficients。 The new society he grades as follows：
〃I。 The barons； graded on the basis of possessions。
〃II。 The court agents and retainers。 （This class will include the
editors of 'respectable' and 'safe' newspapers； the pastors of
'conservative' and 'wealthy' churches； the professors and teachers
in endowed colleges and schools； lawyers generally； and most judges
and politicians）。
〃III。 The workers in pure and applied science； artists； and
physicians。
〃IV。 The entrepreneurs； the managers of the great industries；
transformed into a salaried class。
〃V。 The foremen and superintendents。 This class has heretofore
been recruited largely from the skilled workers； but with the growth
of technical education in schools and colleges； and the development
of fixed caste； it is likely to become entirely differentiated。
〃VI。 The villeins of the cities and towns； more or less regularly
employed； who do skilled work and are partially protected by
organization。
〃VII。 The villeins of the cities and towns who do unskilled work
and are unprotected by organization。 They will comprise the
laborers； domestics； and clerks。
〃VIII。 The villeins of the manorial estates； of the great farms；
the mines； and the forests。
〃IX。 The small…unit farmers （land…owning）； the petty tradesmen； and
manufacturers。
〃X。 The subtenants of the manorial estates and great farms
（corresponding to the class of 'free tenants' in the old Feudalism）。
〃XI。 The cotters。
〃XII。 The tramps； the occasionally employed； the unemployedthe
wastrels of the city and country。〃
〃The new Feudalism； like most autocracies； will foster not only the
arts； but also certain kinds of learningparticularly the kinds
which are unlikely to disturb the minds of the multitude。 A future
Marsh； or Cope； or Le Comte will be liberally patronized and left
free to discover what he will； and so； too； an Edison or a Marconi。
Only they must not meddle with anything relating to social science。〃
It must be confessed that Mr。 Ghent's arguments are cunningly
contrived and arrayed。 They must be read to be appreciated。 As an
example of his style； which at the same time generalizes a portion
of his argument； the following may well be given：
〃The new Feudalism will be but an orderly outgrowth of present
tendencies and conditions。 All societies evolve naturally out of
their predecessors。 In sociology； as in biology； there is no cell
without a parent cell。 The society of each generation develops a
multitude of spontaneous and acquired variations； and out of these；
by a blending process of natural and conscious selection； the
succeeding society is evolved。 The new order will differ in no
important respects from the present； except in the completer
development of its more salient features。 The visitor from another
planet who had known the old and should see the new would note but
few changes。 Alter et Idemanother yet the samehe would say。
From magnate to baron； from workman to villein； from publicist to
court agent and retainer； will be changes of state and function so
slight as to elude all but the keenest eyes。〃
And in conclusion； to show how benevolent and beautiful this new
feudalism of ours will be； Mr。 Ghent says： 〃Peace and stability it
will maintain at all hazards； and the mass； remembering the chaos；
the turmoil； the insecurity of the past； will bless its reign。 。 。 。
Efficiencythe faculty of getting thingsis at last rewarded as it
should be； for the efficient have inherited the earth and its
fulness。 The lowly； whose happiness is greater and whose welfare is
more thoroughly conserved when governed than when governing； as a
twentieth…century philosopher said of them； are settled and happy in
the state which reason and experience teach is their God…appointed
lot。 They are comfortable too； and if the patriarchal ideal of a
vine and fig tree for each is not yet attained； at least each has
his rented patch in the country or his rented cell in a city
building。 Bread and the circus are freely given to the deserving；
and as for the undeserving； they are merely reaping the rewards of
their contumacy and pride。 Order reigns； each has his justly
appointed share； and the state rests； in security； 'lapt in
universal law。'〃
Mr。 Brooks； on the other hand； sees rising and dissolving and rising
again in the social flux the ominous forms of a new society which is
the direct antithesis of a benevolent feudalism。 He trembles at the
rash intrepidity of the capitalists who fight the labor unions； for
by such rashness he greatly fears that labor will b