按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
s public opinion sustains it。 Under any democratic system laws virtually always have the majority opinion back of them； but the minority reserve the right to disregard them if they choose； and the minority will be more aggressive。 Rising from those relaxations of law into far more important ones； it appears that men in business life； feeling themselves hampered by legislation； set themselves to find a way to evade it； justifying themselves in doing so。 The mere fact that it is the law does not weigh heavily。 This is； however； only an inevitable stage in progress from the earliest periods of democracy to later and more substantial periods。 It is a stage which will pass。 There will come a democracy where the rule of the whole is frankly recognized； and where each man holds himself independent of his fellows only in the sense that he will claim the right to hold such relation to God and his duty as he himself may apprehend。
In these times； also； the development of temporal and material prosperity with the intellectual mood which is involved in that affects the attitude of the age toward the Bible。 Sometimes it is spoken of as a scientific age over against the earlier philosophical ages。 Perhaps that will do for a rough statement of the facts。 It is the age of experiment； of trying things out； and there naturally works into men a feeling that the things that will yield to the most material scientific experimentation are the things about which they can be certain and which are of real value。 That naturally involves a good deal of appreciation of the present； and calls for the improvement of the conditions of present life first of all。 It looks more important to see that a man is well fed； well housed； well clothed； and well educated than that he should have the interests of eternity pressed on his attention。 That is a comparatively late feeling。 It issues partly from the fact that this is a scientific age； when science has had its attention turned to the needs of humanity。
Another result of our scientific age is the magnifying of the natural； while the Bible frankly asserts the supernatural。 No effort to get the supernatural out of the Bible； in order to make it entirely acceptable to the man who scouts the supernatural； has thus far proved successful。 Of course； the supernatural can be taken out of the Bible； but it will destroy the Bible。 Nor is there much gain in playing with words and insisting that everything is supernatural or that everything is natural。 There is a difference between the two； and in an age which insists upon nature or natural laws or forces or events as all… sufficient it is almost inevitable that the Bible should lose its hold； at least temporarily。
Regarding all this there are some things that need to be said。 For one thing； this； too； is a passing condition。 As a matter of fact； men are not creatures of time。 They actually have eternal connections； and the great outstanding facts which have always made eternity of importance continue。 The fact is that men continue to die； and that the men who are left behind cannot avoid the sense of mystery and awe which is involved in that fact。 The fact also is that the human emotions cannot be explained on the lower basis； and the only reason men think they can be is because they have in the back of their minds the old explanations which they cast into the lower forms； deceiving themselves into thinking they are new ideas when they are not。
It ought to be added that the Bible has greatly suffered in all its history at the hands of men who have believed in it and have fought in its behalf。 Many of the controversies which were hottest were needless and injurious。 All the folly has not been on one side。 Some one referred the other day to a list of more than a hundred scientific theories which were proposed at the beginning of the last century and abandoned at the end of it。 Scientific men are feeling their way； many of them reverently and devoutly； some of them rather blatantly and with a readiness for publication； which hastens them into notoriety。 But there has been enough folly on both sides to make every one go cautiously。 It has been remarked that in Dr。 Draper's book The Conflict Between Science and Religion he makes science appear as a strong… limbed angel of God whereas religion is always a great ass。 The title of the book itself is not fair。 In no proper understanding of the words can there be any conflict between science and religion。 There can be a conflict； as Dr。 Andrew D。 White puts it； between science and theology。 There can certainly be contest between scientists and religionists。 Science and religion have no conflict。
It is interesting to observe how far back most of the supposed conflicts actually lie。 There is no warfare now； and； while our fathers one or two generations ago felt that they must fly to the defense of religion against the attacks of science； no man wastes his strength doing that to…day。 That period has passed。 The trouble is that some good people do not know it； and are just fond enough of a bit of a tussle to keep up the fighting in the mountain…passes while out in the plain the main armies have laid down their arms and are busy tilling the soil。
The period of conflict is past； partly because we are learning to distinguish between the Bible as it really is and certain long…established ideas about the Bible which came from other sources and have become attached to it until it seemed to sustain them。 The proper doctrine of evolution is entirely compatible with the Bible。 The great Dr。 Hodge declared that the consistent Darwinian must be an atheist。 For that matter； Shelley defended himself by saying that； of course； 〃the consistent Newtonian must necessarily be an atheist。〃 But fifty years have made great changes in the doctrine of evolution； and the old scare has been over for some time。 Newton is honored in the church quite as much as in the university； and Darwin is not a name to frighten anybody。 Understanding evolution better and knowing the Bible better； the two do not jangle out of tune so badly but that harmony is promised。
The doctrine of the antiquity of the world is entirely compatible with the Bible； though it is not compatible with the dates which Archbishop Ussher； in the time of King James； put at the head of the columns。 That is so with other scientific theories。 Any one who has read much of history has attended the obsequies of so many theories in the realm of science that he ought to know that he is wasting his strength in trying to bring about a constant reconciliation between scientific and religious theories。 It is his part to keep an open mind in assurance of the unity of truth； an assurance that there is no fact which can possibly come to light and no true theory of facts which can possibly be formed which does not serve the interest of the truth； which the Bible also presents。 The Bible does not concern itself with all departments of knowledge。 So far as mistakes have been made on the side of those who believe it； they have issued from forgetting that fact more than from any other one cause。
On the other hand； it has sometimes occurred that believers in the Bible have been quite too eager to accommodate themselves to purely passing phases of objection to it。 The matter mentioned a moment ago； the excision of the supernatural； is a case in point。 The easy and glib way in which some have sought to get around difficulties； by talking in large terms about the progressiveness of the revelation； as though the progress were from error to truth； instead of from half light to full light； is another illustration。 The nimble way in which we have turned what is given as history into fiction； and allowed imagination to roam through the Bible； is another illustration。 One of our later writers tells the story of Jonah； and says it sounds like fiction； why not call it fiction？ Another tells the story of the exodus from Egypt； and says it sounds like fiction； why not call it fiction？ Well； certainly the objection is not to the presence of fiction in the Bible。 It is there； openly； confessedly； unashamed。 Fiction can be used with great profit in teaching religious truth。 But fiction may not masquerade in the guise of history； if men are to be led by it or mastered by it。 If the way to be rid of difficulties in a narrative is to turn it into pious fiction； there are other instances where it might be used for relief in emergencies。 The story of the crucifixion of Christ can be told so that it sounds like fiction； why not call it fiction？ Certainly the story of the conversion of Paul can be made to sound like fiction； why not call it fiction？ And there is hardly any bit of narrative that can be made to sound so like fiction as the landing of the Pilgrims； why not call that fiction？ It is the easy way out； the difficulties are all gone like Alice's cat； and there is left only the broad smile of some moral lesson to be learned from the fiction。 It is not； however； the courageous nor the perfectly square way out。 Violence has to be done to the plain narrative； historical statement has to be made only a mask。 And the only reason for it is that there are difficulties not yet cleared。 As for the characters involved； Charles Reade；