°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
giving¡¡¡¡¡¡them¡¡¡¡¡¡complete¡¡¡¡¡¡support£»¡¡¡¡¡¡confident¡¡¡¡¡¡that£»¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡Comrades¡¡¡¡¡¡Lenin¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡
Trotsky¡¡were¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡they¡¡were¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡be¡¡right¡¡this¡¡time£»¡¡as¡¡so¡¡
often¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡heretofore¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡But¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡most¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡part¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡speeches¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡directly¡¡
concerned¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡problem¡¡¡¡¡¡under¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡discussion£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡showed¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡political¡¡
consciousness¡¡which¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡almost¡¡incredible¡¡three¡¡years¡¡ago¡£¡¡
The¡¡Red¡¡Army¡¡served¡¡as¡¡a¡¡text¡¡for¡¡many£»¡¡who¡¡said¡¡that¡¡the¡¡methods¡¡which¡¡
had¡¡produced¡¡that¡¡army¡¡and¡¡its¡¡victories¡¡over¡¡the¡¡Whites¡¡had¡¡been¡¡proved¡¡
successful¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡should¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡used¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡produce¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡Red¡¡¡¡¡¡Army¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Labor¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡
similar¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡victories¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡bloodless¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡front¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡against¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡economic¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡disaster¡£¡¡
Nobody¡¡¡¡¡¡seemed¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡question¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡main¡¡¡¡¡¡idea¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡compulsory¡¡¡¡¡¡labor¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡
contest¡¡that¡¡aroused¡¡real¡¡bitterness¡¡was¡¡between¡¡the¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡individual¡¡
and¡¡¡¡¡¡collegiate¡¡¡¡¡¡command¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡new¡¡¡¡¡¡proposals¡¡¡¡¡¡lead¡¡¡¡¡¡eventually¡¡¡¡¡¡towards¡¡
individual¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡command£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡fears¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡expressed¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡lest¡¡¡¡this¡¡¡¡should¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡mean¡¡
putting¡¡¡¡¡¡summary¡¡¡¡¡¡powers¡¡¡¡¡¡into¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡hands¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡bourgeois¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists£»¡¡¡¡¡¡thus¡¡
nullifying¡¡¡¨workers'¡¡control¡¨¡£¡¡In¡¡¡¡¡¡reply£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡pointed¡¡out¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡individual¡¡
command¡¡had¡¡proved¡¡necessary¡¡in¡¡the¡¡army¡¡and¡¡had¡¡resulted¡¡in¡¡victory¡¡for¡¡
the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡revolution¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡question¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡between¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡
specialists¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Everybody¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡knew¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡necessary¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡
question¡¡was¡¡how¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡most¡¡out¡¡of¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Effective¡¡political¡¡control¡¡
had¡¡secured¡¡that¡¡bourgeois¡¡specialists£»¡¡old¡¡officers£»¡¡led¡¡to¡¡victory¡¡the¡¡army¡¡
of¡¡the¡¡Red¡¡Republic¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡same¡¡result¡¡could¡¡be¡¡secured¡¡in¡¡the¡¡factories¡¡in¡¡
the¡¡same¡¡way¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡pointed¡¡out¡¡that¡¡in¡¡one¡¡year¡¡they¡¡had¡¡succeeded¡¡in¡¡
training¡¡32£»000¡¡Red¡¡Commanders£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡officers¡¡from¡¡the¡¡working¡¡
class¡¡¡¡¡¡itself£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡Utopian¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡hope¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡work¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡similar¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡36¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡37¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡THE¡¡CRISIS¡¡IN¡¡RUSSIA¡¡
output¡¡of¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡workmen¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡technically¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡trained£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡therefore¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡themselves¡¡
qualified¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡individual¡¡¡¡¡¡command¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡factories¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Meanwhile¡¡¡¡¡¡there¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡
nothing¡¡against¡¡the¡¡employment¡¡of¡¡Political¡¡Commissars¡¡in¡¡the¡¡factories¡¡as¡¡
formerly¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡regiments£»¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡control¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡other¡¡¡¡¡¡than¡¡¡¡¡¡technical¡¡¡¡¡¡matters¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡
doings¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡On¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡other¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡hand£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡said¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡
appointment¡¡of¡¡Commissars¡¡would¡¡tend¡¡to¡¡make¡¡Communists¡¡unpopular£»¡¡
since¡¡inevitably¡¡in¡¡many¡¡cases¡¡they¡¡would¡¡have¡¡to¡¡support¡¡the¡¡specialists¡¡
against¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡workmen£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡collegiate¡¡¡¡¡¡system¡¡¡¡¡¡made¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡workmen¡¡
feel¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡they¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡actually¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡masters£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡so¡¡¡¡¡¡gave¡¡¡¡¡¡possibilities¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡
enthusiastic¡¡¡¡¡¡work¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡otherwise¡¡¡¡¡¡obtainable¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡This¡¡¡¡¡¡last¡¡¡¡¡¡point¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡hotly¡¡
challenged¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡said¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡collegiate¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡control¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡meant¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡little¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡effect£»¡¡
except¡¡waste¡¡of¡¡time¡¡and¡¡efficiency£»¡¡because¡¡at¡¡worst¡¡work¡¡was¡¡delayed¡¡by¡¡
disputes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡at¡¡¡¡¡¡best¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡workmen¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡members¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡college¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡merely¡¡
countersigned¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡orders¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡decided¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡upon¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡specialists¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡
enthusiastic¡¡¡¡¡¡work¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡said¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡fairy¡¡¡¡¡¡story¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡If¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡really¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡
found¡¡then¡¡there¡¡would¡¡be¡¡no¡¡need¡¡for¡¡a¡¡conference¡¡to¡¡discover¡¡how¡¡to¡¡get¡¡
it¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡most¡¡serious¡¡opposition£»¡¡or¡¡at¡¡least¡¡the¡¡most¡¡serious¡¡argument¡¡put¡¡
forward£»¡¡for¡¡there¡¡was¡¡less¡¡opposition¡¡than¡¡actual¡¡discussion£»¡¡came¡¡from¡¡
some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Trade¡¡Unionists¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡good¡¡deal¡¡was¡¡said¡¡
about¡¡the¡¡position¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Trades¡¡Unions¡¡in¡¡a¡¡Socialist¡¡State¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡There¡¡was¡¡
general¡¡recognition¡¡that¡¡since¡¡the¡¡Trade¡¡Unions¡¡themselves¡¡controlled¡¡the¡¡
conditions¡¡of¡¡labor¡¡and¡¡wages£»¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡their¡¡old¡¡work¡¡of¡¡organizing¡¡
strikes¡¡against¡¡capitalists¡¡had¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡have¡¡any¡¡meaning£»¡¡since¡¡to¡¡strike¡¡
now¡¡would¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡strike¡¡against¡¡their¡¡own¡¡¡¡¡¡decisions¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡At¡¡the¡¡same¡¡¡¡¡¡time£»¡¡
certain¡¡tendencies¡¡to¡¡Syndicalism¡¡were¡¡still¡¡in¡¡existence£»¡¡tendencies¡¡which¡¡
might¡¡well¡¡lead¡¡to¡¡conflict¡¡between¡¡different¡¡unions£»¡¡so¡¡that£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡
the¡¡match¡¡makers¡¡or¡¡the¡¡metal¡¡worker£»¡¡might¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡strike¡¡a¡¡bargain¡¡with¡¡
the¡¡State£»¡¡as¡¡of¡¡one¡¡country¡¡with¡¡another£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡might¡¡easily¡¡lead¡¡to¡¡a¡¡
complete¡¡collapse¡¡of¡¡the¡¡socialist¡¡system¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡one¡¡¡¡¡¡thing¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡which¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡speakers¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡complete¡¡¡¡¡¡agreement¡¡
was¡¡the¡¡absolute¡¡need¡¡of¡¡an¡¡effort¡¡in¡¡industry¡¡equal¡¡to£»¡¡if¡¡not¡¡greater¡¡than£»¡¡
the¡¡effort¡¡made¡¡in¡¡the¡¡army¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡thought¡¡it¡¡significant¡¡that¡¡in¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡37¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡38¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡THE¡¡CRISIS¡¡IN¡¡RUSSIA¡¡
speeches¡¡the¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡this¡¡effort¡¡was¡¡urged¡¡as¡¡the¡¡only¡¡possible¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡means¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡retaining¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡support¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡peasants¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡There¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡tacit¡¡
recognition¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Conference¡¡¡¡¡¡represented¡¡¡¡¡¡town¡¡¡¡¡¡workers¡¡¡¡¡¡only¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin£»¡¡
who¡¡had¡¡belonged¡¡to¡¡the¡¡old¡¡school¡¡which¡¡had¡¡grown¡¡up¡¡with¡¡its¡¡eyes¡¡on¡¡
the¡¡industrial¡¡countries¡¡of¡¡the¡¡West¡¡and¡¡believed¡¡that¡¡revolution¡¡could¡¡be¡¡
brought¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡town¡¡¡¡¡¡workers¡¡¡¡¡¡alone£»¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡exclusively¡¡¡¡¡¡their¡¡
affair£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡all¡¡else¡¡was¡¡of¡¡minor¡¡importance£»¡¡unguardedly¡¡spoke¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
peasant¡¡as¡¡¡¨our¡¡neighbor¡£¡¨¡¡In¡¡Javoslavl£»¡¡country¡¡and¡¡town¡¡are¡¡too¡¡near¡¡to¡¡
allow¡¡the¡¡main¡¡problem¡¡of¡¡the¡¡revolution¡¡to¡¡be¡¡thus¡¡easily¡¡dismissed¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡
was¡¡instantly¡¡¡¡pointed¡¡out¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡much¡¡more¡¡¡¡intimate£»¡¡¡¡and¡¡
that£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡it¡¡were¡¡only¡¡¡¨neighborly£»¡¨¡¡peace¡¡could¡¡not¡¡long¡¡be¡¡preserved¡¡
if¡¡it¡¡were¡¡continually¡¡necessary¡¡for¡¡one¡¡neighbor¡¡to¡¡steal¡¡the¡¡chickens¡¡of¡¡
the¡¡other¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡These¡¡town¡¡workers¡¡of¡¡a¡¡district¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡agricultural¡¡
were¡¡very¡¡sure¡¡that¡¡the¡¡most¡¡urgent¡¡of¡¡all¡¡tasks¡¡was¡¡to¡¡raise¡¡industry¡¡to¡¡the¡¡
point¡¡at¡¡which¡¡the¡¡town¡¡would¡¡really¡¡be¡¡able¡¡to¡¡supply¡¡the¡¡village¡¡with¡¡its¡¡
needs¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin¡¡and¡¡Radek¡¡severally¡¡summed¡¡up¡¡and¡¡made¡¡final¡¡attacks¡¡on¡¡each¡¡
other's¡¡¡¡¡¡positions£»¡¡¡¡¡¡after¡¡¡¡¡¡which¡¡¡¡¡¡Radek's¡¡¡¡¡¡resolution¡¡¡¡¡¡approving¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡theses¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡
the¡¡¡¡¡¡Central¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Committee¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡passed¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡almost¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡unanimously¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡four¡¡
amendments¡¡received¡¡1£»¡¡3£»¡¡7¡¡and¡¡1¡¡vote¡¡apiece¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡This¡¡result¡¡was¡¡received¡¡
with¡¡cheering¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡theater£»¡¡and¡¡showed¡¡the¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡such¡¡
Conferences¡¡in¡¡smoothing¡¡the¡¡way¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Dictatorship£»¡¡since¡¡it¡¡had¡¡been¡¡
quite¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡obvious¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡when¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡discussion¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡began¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡very¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡much¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡larger¡¡
proportion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡delegates¡¡than¡¡finally¡¡voted¡¡for¡¡his¡¡resolution¡¡had¡¡been¡¡
more¡¡¡¡¡¡or¡¡¡¡¡¡less¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡sympathy¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡opposition¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Central¡¡
Committee¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡There¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡followed¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡elections¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Party¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Conference¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡Moscow¡£¡¡
Rostopchin£»¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡president£»¡¡¡¡¡¡read¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡list¡¡¡¡¡¡which¡¡¡¡¡¡had¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡submitted¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡
various¡¡¡¡¡¡ouyezds¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Jaroslavl¡¡¡¡¡¡Government¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡They¡¡¡¡¡¡were¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡send¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡
Moscow¡¡¡¡¡¡fifteen¡¡¡¡¡¡delegates¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡right¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡vote£»¡¡¡¡¡¡together¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡another¡¡
fifteen¡¡with¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡speak¡¡but¡¡not¡¡to¡¡vote¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡done¡¡much¡¡
work¡¡in¡¡the¡¡district£»¡¡was¡¡mentioned¡¡as¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fifteen¡¡voting¡¡delegates£»¡¡
but¡¡he¡¡stood¡¡up¡¡and¡¡said¡¡that¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Conference¡¡had¡¡so¡¡clearly¡¡expressed¡¡
its¡¡¡¡¡¡disagreement¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡views£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡he¡¡¡¡thought¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡better¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡withdraw¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡38¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡39¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡THE¡¡CRISIS¡¡IN¡¡RUSSIA¡¡
candidature¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Rostopchin¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡put¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Conference¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡although¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡they¡¡
disagreed¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡Larin£»¡¡yet¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡as¡¡well¡¡that¡¡he¡¡should¡¡have¡¡the¡¡opportunity¡¡
of¡¡stating¡¡his¡¡views¡¡at¡¡the¡¡All¡Russian¡¡Conference£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡discussion¡¡there¡¡
should¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡final¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡many¡sided¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡possible¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Conference¡¡
expressed¡¡¡¡¡¡its¡¡¡¡¡¡agreement¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡this¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Larin¡¡¡¡¡¡withdrew¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡withdrawal£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡
was¡¡presently¡¡elected¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡main¡¡object¡¡of¡¡these¡¡conferences¡¡in¡¡unifying¡¡
opinion¡¡and¡¡in¡¡arming¡¡Communists¡¡with¡¡argument¡¡for¡¡the¡¡defence¡¡of¡¡this¡¡
unified¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡opinion¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡mong¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡masses¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡again¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡illustrated¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡when¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡
Conference£»¡¡in¡¡leaving¡¡it¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ouyezds¡¡to¡¡choose¡¡for¡¡themselves¡¡the¡¡non¡¡¡
voting¡¡delegates¡¡urged¡¡them¡¡to¡¡select¡¡wherever¡¡possible¡¡people¡¡who¡¡would¡¡
have¡¡the¡¡widest¡¡opportunities¡¡of¡¡explaining¡¡on¡¡their¡¡return¡¡to¡¡the¡¡district¡¡
whatever¡¡results¡¡might¡¡be¡¡reached¡¡in¡¡Moscow¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡¡¡was¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡now¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡pretty¡¡¡¡¡¡late¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡evening£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡after¡¡¡¡¡¡another¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡very¡¡
satisfactory¡¡¡¡¡¡visit¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡pr