按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
e to the EDINBURGH EDITION of R。 L。 Stevenson's works。 The moral element is implicit in the drama； and it is implicit there because it is implicit in life itself； or so the great common…sense conceives it and demands it。 What we might call the asides proper of the drama； are 〃remarks about morals；〃 nothing else … the chorus in the Greek tragedy gathered up 〃remarks about morals〃 as near as might be to the 〃remarks about morals〃 in the streets of that day； only shaped to a certain artistic consistency。 Shakespeare is rich in 〃remarks about morals；〃 often coming near； indeed； to personal utterance； and this not only when Polonius addresses his son before his going forth on his travels。 Mr Henley here only too plainly confessed； indeed； to lack of that conviction and insight which； had he but possessed them； might have done a little to relieve BEAU AUSTIN and the other plays in which he collaborated with R。 L。 Stevenson； from their besetting and fatal weakness。 The two youths； alas！ thought they could be grandly original by despising； or worse； contemning 〃remarks about morals〃 in the loftier as in the lower sense。 To 〃live a full and varied life；〃 if the experience derived from it is to have expression in the drama； is only to have the richer resource in 〃remarks about morals。〃 If this is perverted under any self…conscious notion of doing something spick…and…span new in the way of character and plot； alien to all the old conceptions； then we know our writers set themselves boldly at loggerheads with certain old…fashioned and yet older new…fashioned laws； which forbid the violation of certain common demands of the ordinary nature and common…sense； and for the lack of this； as said already； no cleverness； no resource； no style or graft； will any way make up。 So long as this is tried； with whatever concentration of mind and purpose； failure is yet inevitable； and the more inevitable the more concentration and less of humorous by…play； because genius itself； if it despises the general moral sentiment and instinct for moral proportion … an ethnic reward and punishment； so to say … is all astray； working outside the line； and this； if Mr Pinero will kindly excuse me； is the secret of the failure of these plays； and not want of concentration； etc。； in the sense he meant； or as he has put it。
Stevenson rather affected what he called 〃tail…foremost morality；〃 a kind of inversion in the field of morals； as De Quincey mixed it up with tail…foremost humour in MURDER AS A FINE ART； etc。； etc。； but for all such perversions as these the stage is a grand test and corrector； and such perversions； and not 〃remarks about morals；〃 are most strictly prohibited there。 Perverted subtleties of the sort Stevenson in earlier times especially much affected are not only amiss but ruinous on the stage； and what genius itself would maybe sanction； common…sense must reject and rigidly cut away。 Final success and triumph come largely by THIS kind of condensation and concentration； and the stern and severe lopping off of the indulgence of the EGOTISTICAL genius； which is human discipline； and the best exponent of the doctrine of unity also。 This is the straight and the narrow way along which genius； if it walk but faithfully； sows as it goes in the dramatic pathway all the flowers of human passion； hope； love； terror； and triumph。
I find it advisable； if not needful； here to reinforce my own impressions； at some points； by another quotation from Mr Baildon； if he will allow me； in which Stevenson's dependence in certain respects on the dream…faculty is emphasised； and to it is traced a certain tendency to a moral callousness or indifference which is one of the things in which the waking Stevenson transparently suffered now and then invasions from the dream…Stevenson … the result； a kind of spot； as we may call it； on the eye of the moral sense； it is a small spot； but we know how a very small object held close before the eye will wholly shut out the most lovely natural prospects； interposing distressful phantasmagoria； due to the strained and； for the time； morbid condition of the organ itself。 So； it must be confessed； it is to a great extent here。
But listen to Mr Baildon：
〃In A CHAPTER ON DREAMS； Stevenson confesses his indebtedness to this still mysterious agency。 From a child he had been a great and vivid dreamer； his dreams often taking such frightful shape that he used to awake 'clinging in terror to the bedpost。' Later in life his dreams continued to be frequent and vivid； but less terrifying in character and more continuous and systematic。 'The Brownies；' as he picturesquely names that 'sub…conscious imagination；' as the scientist would call it； that works with such surprising freedom and ingenuity in our dreams； became； as it were； COLLABORATEURS in his work of authorship。 He declares that they invented plots and even elaborated whole novels； and that； not in a single night or single dream； but continuously； and from one night to another； like a story in serial parts。 Long before this essay was written or published； I had been struck by this phantasmal dream…like quality in some of Stevenson's works； which I was puzzled to account for； until I read this extraordinary explanation； for explanation it undoubtedly affords。 Anything imagined in a dream would have a tendency； when retold； to retain something of its dream…like character； and I have on doubt one could trace in many instances and distinguish the dreaming and the waking Stevenson； though in others they may be blended beyond recognition。 The trouble with the Brownies or the dream…Stevenson WAS HIS OR THEIR WANT OF MORAL SENSE； so that they sometimes presented the waking author with plots which he could not make use of。 Of this Stevenson gives an instance in which a complete story of marked ingenuity is vetoed through the moral impossibility of its presentment by a writer so scrupulous （and in some directions he is extremely scrupulous） as Stevenson was。 But Stevenson admits that his most famous story； THE STRANGE CASE OF DR JEKYLL AND MR HYDE； was not only suggested by a dream； but that some of the most important and most criticised points； such as the matter of the powder； were taken direct from the dream。 It had been extremely instructive and interesting had he gone more into detail and mentioned some of the other stories into which the dream…element entered largely and pointed out its influence； and would have given us a better clue than we have or now ever can have。
〃Even in THE SUICIDE CLUB and the RAJAH'S DIAMOND； I seem to feel strongly the presence of the dream…Stevenson。 。 。 。 AT CERTAIN POINTS ONE FEELS CONSCIOUS OF A CERTAIN MORAL CALLOUSNESS； SUCH AS MARKS THE DREAM STATE； AS IN THE MURDER OF COLONEL GERALDINE'S BROTHER； THE HORROR OF WHICH NEVER SEEMS TO COME FULLY HOME TO US。 But let no one suppose these stories are lacking in vividness and in strangely realistic detail； for this is of the very nature of dreaming at its height。 。 。 。 While the DRAMATIS PERSONAE play their parts with the utmost spirit while the story proceeds； they do not； as the past creations do； seem to survive this first contact and live in our minds。 This is particularly true of the women。 They are well drawn； and play the assigned parts well enough； but they do not； as a rule； make a place for themselves either in our hearts or memories。 If there is an exception it is Elvira； in PROVIDENCE AND THE GUITAR； but we remember her chiefly by the one picture of her falling asleep； after the misadventures of the night； at the supper…table； with her head on her husband's shoulder； and her hand locked in his with instinctive； almost unconscious tenderness。〃
CHAPTER XXVII … MR G。 MOORE； MR MARRIOTT WATSON AND OTHERS
FROM our point of view it will therefore be seen that we could not have read Mr George Moore's wonderfully uncritical and misdirected diatribe against Stevenson in THE DAILY CHRONICLE of 24th April 1897； without amusement； if not without laughter … indeed； we confess we may here quote Shakespeare's words； we 〃laughed so consumedly〃 that； unless for Mr Moore's high position and his assured self…confidence； we should not trust ourselves to refer to it； not to speak of writing about it。 It was a review of THE SECRET ROSE by W。 B。 Yeats； but it passed after one single touch to belittling abuse of Stevenson … an abuse that was justified the more； in Mr Moore's idea； because Stevenson was dead。 Had he been alive he might have had something to say to it； in the way； at least； of fable and moral。 And when towards the close Mr Moore again quotes from Mr Yeats； it is still 〃harping on my daughter〃 to undo Stevenson； as though a rat was behind the arras； as in HAMLET。 〃Stevenson；〃 says he； 〃is the leader of these countless writers who perceive nothing but the visible world；〃 and these are antagonistic to the great literature； of which Mr Yeats's SECRET ROSE is a survival or a renaissance； a literature whose watchword should be Mr Yeats's significant phrase； 〃When one looks into the darkness there is always something there。〃 No doubt Mr Y