友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
九色书籍 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

robert louis stevenson-第38章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



R OF SOME REPUTE; who was to die in 1878。〃


Mr Sam Bough WAS 〃a water…colour painter of some repute;〃 but a  painter in oils of yet greater repute … a man of rare strength;  resource; and facility … never; perhaps; wholly escaping from some  traces of his early experiences in scene…painting; but a true  genius in his art。  Ah; well I remember him; though an older man;  yet youthful in the band of young Scotch artists among whom as a  youngster I was privileged to move in Edinburgh … Pettie; Chalmers;  M'Whirter; Peter Graham; MacTaggart; MacDonald; John Burr; and  Bough。  Bough could be voluble on art; and many a talk I had with  him as with the others named; especially with John Burr。  Bough and  he both could talk as well as paint; and talk right well。  Bough  had a slight cast in the eye; when he got a WEE excited on his  subject he would come close to you with head shaking; and  spectacles displaced; and forelock wagging; and the cast would seem  to die away。  Was this a fact; or was it an illusion on my part?  I  have often asked myself that question; and now I ask it of others。   Can any of my good friends in Edinburgh say; can Mr Caw help me  here; either to confirm or to correct me?  I venture to insert here  an anecdote; with which my friend of old days; Mr Wm。 MacTaggart;  R。S。A。; in a letter kindly favours me:


〃Sam Bough was a very sociable man; and; when on a sketching tour;  liked to have a young artist or two with him。  Jack Nisbett played  the violin; and Sam the 'cello; etc。  Jack was fond of telling that  Sam used to let them all choose the best views; and then he would  take what was left; and Jack; with mild astonishment; would say;  that 'it generally turned out to be the best … on the canvas!'〃


In Mr Hammerton's copy of the verses in reply to Mr Crockett's  dedication of THE STICKIT MINISTER to Stevenson; in which occurred  the fine phrase 〃The grey Galloway lands; where about the graves of  the martyrs the whaups are crying; his heart remembers how〃:


〃Blows the wind to…day and the sun and the rain are flying: Blows the wind on the moors to…day and now; Where about the graves of the martyrs the whaups are crying; My heart remembers how。

〃Grey recumbent tombs of the dead in desert places; Standing stones on the vacant wine…red moor; Hills of sheep; and the HOMES of the silent vanished races; And winds austere and pure。

〃Be it granted me to behold you again in dying; Hills of home! and to hear again the call … Hear about the graves of the martyrs the pee…weet crying; And hear no more at all。〃


Mr Hammerton prints HOWES instead of HOMES; which I have italicised  above。  And I may note; though it does not affect the poetry; if it  does a little affect the natural history; that the PEE…WEETS and  the whaups are not the same … the one is the curlew; and the other  is the lapwing … the one most frequenting wild; heathery or peaty  moorland; and the other pasture or even ploughed land … so that it  is a great pity for unity and simplicity alike that Stevenson did  not repeat the 〃whaup;〃 but wrote rather as though pee…weet or pee… weets were the same as whaups … the common call of the one is KER… LEE; KER…LEE; and of the other PEE…WEET; PEE…WEET; hence its common  name。

It is a pity; too; that Mr Hammerton has no records of some  portions of the life at Davos Platz。  Not only was Stevenson ill  there in April 1892; but his wife collapsed; and the tender concern  for her made havoc with some details of his literary work。  It is  good to know this。  Such errata or omissions throw a finer light on  his character than controlling perfection would do。  Ah; I remember  how my old friend W。 B。 Rands (〃Matthew Browne〃 and 〃Henry  Holbeach〃) was wont to declare that were men perfect they would be  isolated; if not idiotic; that we are united to each other by our  defects … that even physical beauty would be dead like later Greek  statues; were these not departures from the perfect lines。  The  letter given by me at p。 28 transfigures in its light; some of his  work at that time。

And then what an opportunity; we deeply regret to say; Mr Hammerton  wholly missed; when he passed over without due explanation or  commentary that most significant pamphlet … the ADDRESS TO THE  SCOTTISH CLERGY。  If Mr Hammerton had but duly and closely studied  that and its bearings and suggestions in many directions; then he  would have written such a chapter for true enlightenment and for  interest as exactly his book … attractive though it is in much …  yet specially lacks。  It is to be hoped that Mr Sidney Colvin will  not once more miss the chance which is thus still left open to him  to perfect his LIFE OF STEVENSON; and make it more interpretive  than anything yet published。  If he does this; then; a dreadful  LACUNA in the EDINBURGH EDITION will also be supplied。

Carefully reading over again Mr Arthur Symons' STUDIES IN TWO  LITERATURES … published some years ago … I have come across  instances of apparent contradiction which; so far as I can see; he  does not critically altogether reconcile; despite his ingenuity and  great charm of style。  One relates to Thoreau; who; while still  〃sturdy〃 as Emerson says; 〃and like an elm tree;〃 as his sister  Sophia says; showed exactly the same love of nature and power of  interpreting her as he did after in his later comparatively short  period of 〃invalidity;〃 while Mr Symons says his view of Nature  absolutely was that of the invalid; classing him unqualifiedly with  Jefferies and Stevenson; as invalid。  Thoreau's mark even in the  short later period of 〃invalidity〃 was complete and robust  independence and triumph over it … a thing which I have no doubt  wholly captivated Stevenson; as scarce anything else would have  done; as a victory in the exact ROLE he himself was most ambitious  to fill。  For did not he too wrestle well with the 〃wolverine〃 he  carried on his back … in this like Addington Symonds and Alexander  Pope?  Surely I cannot be wrong here to reinforce my statement by a  passage from a letter written by Sophia Thoreau to her good friend  Daniel Ricketson; after her brother's death; the more that R。 L。  Stevenson would have greatly exulted too in its cheery and  invincible stoicism:


〃Profound joy mingles with my grief。  I feel as if something very  beautiful had happened … not death; although Henry is with us no  longer; yet the memory of his sweet and virtuous soul must ever  cheer and comfort me。  My heart is filled with praise to God for  the gift of such a brother; and may I never distrust the love and  wisdom of Him who made him and who has now called him to labour in  more glorious fields than earth affords。  You ask for some  particulars relating to Henry's illness。  I feel like saying that  Henry was never affected; never reached by it。  I never before saw  such a manifestation of the power of spirit over matter。  Very  often I heard him tell his visitors that he enjoyed existence as  well as ever。  The thought of death; he said; did not trouble him。   His thoughts had entertained him all his life and did still。。。。 He  considered occupation as necessary for the sick as for those in  health; and accomplished a vast amount of labour in those last few  months。〃


A rare 〃invalidity〃 this … a little confusing easy classifications。   I think Stevenson would have felt and said that brother and sister  were well worthy of each other; and that the sister was almost as  grand and cheery a stoic; with no literary profession of it; as was  the brother。

The other thing relates to Stevenson's HUMAN SOUL。  I find Mr  Symons says; at p。 243; that Stevenson 〃had something a trifle  elfish and uncanny about him; as of a bewitched being who was not  actually human … had not actually a human soul〃 … in which there  may be a glimmer of truth viewed from his revelation of artistic  curiosities in some aspects; but is hardly true of him otherwise;  and this Mr Symons himself seems to have felt; when; at p。 246; he  writes:  〃He is one of those writers who speak TO US ON EASY TERMS;  with whom we MAY EXCHANGE AFFECTIONS。〃  How 〃affections〃 could be  exchanged on easy terms between the normal human being and an  elfish creature actually WITHOUT A HUMAN SOUL (seeing that  affections are; as Mr Matthew Arnold might have said; at least;  three…fourths of soul) is more; I confess; than I can quite see at  present; but in this rather MALADROIT contradiction Mr Symons does  point at one phase of the problem of Stevenson … this; namely that  to all the ordinary happy or pleasure…endings he opposes; as it  were of set purpose; gloom; as though to certain things he was  quite indifferent; and though; as we have seen; his actual life and  practice were quite opposed to this。

I am sorry I CANNOT find the link in Mr Symons' essay; which would  quite make these two statements consistently coincide critically。   As an enthusiastic; though I hope still a discriminating;  Stevensonian; I do wish Mr Symons would help us to it somehow  hereafter。  It would be well worth his doing; in my opinion。



CHAPTER XXXIV … LETTERS AND POEMS IN TESTIMONY



AMONG many letters received by me in acknowledgment of; or in  commentary on; my little tributes to R。 L。 Stevenson; in vari
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!