友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
九色书籍 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

alcibiades ii-第3章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




you think that he would ever have laid hands upon her?



ALCIBIADES:  No。



SOCRATES:  He did not intend to slay the first woman he came across; nor

any one else's mother; but only his own?



ALCIBIADES:  True。



SOCRATES:  Ignorance; then; is better for those who are in such a frame of

mind; and have such ideas?



ALCIBIADES:  Obviously。



SOCRATES:  You acknowledge that for some persons in certain cases the

ignorance of some things is a good and not an evil; as you formerly

supposed?



ALCIBIADES:  I do。



SOCRATES:  And there is still another case which will also perhaps appear

strange to you; if you will consider it?  (The reading is here uncertain。)



ALCIBIADES:  What is that; Socrates?



SOCRATES:  It may be; in short; that the possession of all the sciences; if

unaccompanied by the knowledge of the best; will more often than not injure

the possessor。  Consider the matter thus:Must we not; when we intend

either to do or say anything; suppose that we know or ought to know that

which we propose so confidently to do or say?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes; in my opinion。



SOCRATES:  We may take the orators for an example; who from time to time

advise us about war and peace; or the building of walls and the

construction of harbours; whether they understand the business in hand; or

only think that they do。  Whatever the city; in a word; does to another

city; or in the management of her own affairs; all happens by the counsel

of the orators。



ALCIBIADES:  True。



SOCRATES:  But now see what follows; if I can (make it clear to you)。 

(Some words appear to have dropped out here。)  You would distinguish the

wise from the foolish?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:  The many are foolish; the few wise?



ALCIBIADES:  Certainly。



SOCRATES:  And you use both the terms; 'wise' and 'foolish;' in reference

to something?



ALCIBIADES:  I do。



SOCRATES:  Would you call a person wise who can give advice; but does not

know whether or when it is better to carry out the advice?



ALCIBIADES:  Decidedly not。



SOCRATES:  Nor again; I suppose; a person who knows the art of war; but

does not know whether it is better to go to war or for how long?



ALCIBIADES:  No。



SOCRATES:  Nor; once more; a person who knows how to kill another or to

take away his property or to drive him from his native land; but not when

it is better to do so or for whom it is better?



ALCIBIADES:  Certainly not。



SOCRATES:  But he who understands anything of the kind and has at the same

time the knowledge of the best course of action:and the best and the

useful are surely the same?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:Such an one; I say; we should call wise and a useful adviser

both of himself and of the city。  What do you think?



ALCIBIADES:  I agree。



SOCRATES:  And if any one knows how to ride or to shoot with the bow or to

box or to wrestle; or to engage in any other sort of contest or to do

anything whatever which is in the nature of an art;what do you call him

who knows what is best according to that art?  Do you not speak of one who

knows what is best in riding as a good rider?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:  And in a similar way you speak of a good boxer or a good flute…

player or a good performer in any other art?



ALCIBIADES:  True。



SOCRATES:  But is it necessary that the man who is clever in any of these

arts should be wise also in general?  Or is there a difference between the

clever artist and the wise man?



ALCIBIADES:  All the difference in the world。



SOCRATES:  And what sort of a state do you think that would be which was

composed of good archers and flute…players and athletes and masters in

other arts; and besides them of those others about whom we spoke; who knew

how to go to war and how to kill; as well as of orators puffed up with

political pride; but in which not one of them all had this knowledge of the

best; and there was no one who could tell when it was better to apply any

of these arts or in regard to whom?



ALCIBIADES:  I should call such a state bad; Socrates。



SOCRATES:  You certainly would when you saw each of them rivalling the

other and esteeming that of the greatest importance in the state;



'Wherein he himself most excelled。'  (Euripides; Antiope。)



I mean that which was best in any art; while he was entirely ignorant of

what was best for himself and for the state; because; as I think; he trusts

to opinion which is devoid of intelligence。  In such a case should we not

be right if we said that the state would be full of anarchy and

lawlessness?



ALCIBIADES:  Decidedly。



SOCRATES:  But ought we not then; think you; either to fancy that we know

or really to know; what we confidently propose to do or say?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:  And if a person does that which he knows or supposes that he

knows; and the result is beneficial; he will act advantageously both for

himself and for the state?



ALCIBIADES:  True。



SOCRATES:  And if he do the contrary; both he and the state will suffer?



ALCIBIADES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:  Well; and are you of the same mind; as before?



ALCIBIADES:  I am。



SOCRATES:  But were you not saying that you would call the many unwise and

the few wise?



ALCIBIADES:  I was。



SOCRATES:  And have we not come back to our old assertion that the many

fail to obtain the best because they trust to opinion which is devoid of

intelligence?



ALCIBIADES:  That is the case。



SOCRATES:  It is good; then; for the many; if they particularly desire to

do that which they know or suppose that they know; neither to know nor to

suppose that they know; in cases where if they carry out their ideas in

action they will be losers rather than gainers?



ALCIBIADES:  What you say is very true。



SOCRATES:  Do you not see that I was really speaking the truth when I

affirmed that the possession of any other kind of knowledge was more likely

to injure than to benefit the possessor; unless he had also the knowledge

of the best?



ALCIBIADES:  I do now; if I did not before; Socrates。



SOCRATES:  The state or the soul; therefore; which wishes to have a right

existence must hold firmly to this knowledge; just as the sick man clings

to the physician; or the passenger depends for safety on the pilot。  And if

the soul does not set sail until she have obtained this she will be all the

safer in the voyage through life。  But when she rushes in pursuit of wealth

or bodily strength or anything else; not having the knowledge of the best;

so much the more is she likely to meet with misfortune。  And he who has the

love of learning (Or; reading polumatheian; 'abundant learning。'); and is

skilful in many arts; and does not possess the knowledge of the best; but

is under some other guidance; will make; as he deserves; a sorry voyage:

he will; I believe; hurry through the brief space of human life; pilotless

in mid…ocean; and the words will apply to him in which the poet blamed his

enemy:



'。。。Full many a thing he knew;

But knew them all badly。'  (A fragment from the pseudo…Homeric poem;

'Margites。')



ALCIBIADES:  How in the world; Socrates; do the words of the poet apply to

him?  They seem to me to have no bearing on the point whatever。



SOCRATES:  Quite the contrary; my sweet friend:  only the poet is talking

in riddles after the fashion of his tribe。  For all poetry has by nature an

enigmatical character; and it is by no means everybody who can interpret

it。  And if; moreover; the spirit of poetry happen to seize on a man who is

of a begrudging temper and does not care to manifest his wisdom but keeps

it to himself as far as he can; it does indeed require an almost superhuman

wisdom to discover what the poet would be at。  You surely do not suppose

that Homer; the wisest and most divine of poets; was unaware of the

impossibility of knowing a thing badly:  for it was no less a person than

he who said of Margites that 'he knew many things; but knew them all

badly。'  The solution of the riddle is this; I imagine:By 'badly' Homer

meant 'bad' and 'knew' stands for 'to know。'  Put the words together;the

metre will suffer; but the poet's meaning is clear;'Margites knew all

these things; but it was bad for him to know them。'  And; obviously; if it

was bad for him to know so many things; he must have been a good…for…

nothing; unless the argument has played us false。



ALCIBIADES:  But I do not think that it has; Socrates:  at least; if the

argument is fallacious; it would be difficult for me to find another which

I could trust。



SOCRATES:  And you are right in thinking so。



ALCIBIADES:  Well; that is my opinion。



SOCRATES:  But tell me; by Heaven:you must see now the nature and

greatness of the difficulty in which you; like others; have your part。  For

you change about in all directions; and ne
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!