按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
a lion had lately come to pass； was no other than Micaiah； the
son of Imlah； who； as he now denounced God's judgment on
disobedient Ahab； seems directly to have been that very prophet
whom the same Ahab； in 1 Kings 22：8； 18； complains of； 〃as one
whom he hated； because he did not prophesy good concerning him；
but evil；〃 and who in that chapter openly repeats his
denunciations against him； all which came to pass accordingly；
nor is there any reason to doubt but this and the former were the
very same prophet。
（41） What is most remarkable in this history； and in many
histories on other occasions in the Old Testament； is this； that
during the Jewish theocracy God acted entirely as the supreme
King of Israel； and the supreme General of their armies； and
always expected that the Israelites should be in such absolute
subjection to him； their supreme and heavenly King； and General
of their armies； as subjects and soldiers are to their earthly
kings and generals； and that usually without knowing the
particular reasons of their injunctions。
（42） These reasonings of Zedekiah the false prophet； in order to
persuade Ahab not to believe Micaiah the true prophet； are
plausible； but being omitted in our other copies； we cannot now
tell whence Josephus had them； whether from his own temple copy；
from some other original author； or from certain ancient notes。
That some such plausible objection was now raised against Micaiah
is very likely； otherwise Jehoshaphat； who used to disbelieve all
such false prophets； could never have been induced to accompany
Ahab in these desperate circumstances。
（43） This reading of Josephus； that Jehoshaphat put on not his
own； but Ahab's robes； in order to appear to be Ahab； while Ahab
was without any robes at all； and hoped thereby to escape his own
evil fate； and disprove Micaiah's prophecy against him； is
exceeding probable。 It gives great light also to this whole
history； and shows； that although Ahab hoped Jehoshaphat would he
mistaken for him； and run the only risk of being slain in the
battle； yet he was entirely disappointed； while still the escape
of the good man Jehoshaphat； and the slaughter of the bad man
Ahab； demonstrated the great distinction that Divine providence
made betwixt them。
（44） We have here a very wise reflection of Josephus about Divine
Providence； and what is derived from it； prophecy； and the
inevitable certainty of its accomplishment； and that when wicked
men think they take proper methods to elude what is denounced
against them； and to escape the Divine judgments thereby
threatened them； without repentance； they are ever by Providence
infatuated to bring about their own destruction； and thereby
withal to demonstrate the perfect veracity of that God whose
predictions they in vain endeavored to elude。
BOOK 9 FOOTNOTES
（1） These judges constituted by Jehoshaphat were a kind of
Jerusalem Sanhedrim； out of the priests； the Levites； and the
principal of the people； both here and 2 Chronicles 19：8； much
like the old Christian judicatures of the bishop； the presbyters；
the deacons； and the people。
（2） Concerning this precious balsam； see the note on Atiq。 B。
VIII。 ch。 6。 sect。 6。
（3） What are here Pontus and Thrace； as the places whither
Jehoshaphat's fleet sailed； are in our other copies Ophir and
Tarshish； and the place whence it sailed is in them Eziongeber；
which lay on the Red Sea； whence it was impossible for any ships
to sail to Pontus or Thrace； so that Josephus's copy differed
from our other copies； as is further plain from his own words；
which render what we read； that 〃the ships were broken at
Eziongeber； from their unwieldy greatness。〃 But so far we may
conclude； that Josephus thought one Ophir to be some where in the
Mediterranean； and not in the South Sea； though perhaps there
might be another Ophir in that South Sea also； and that fleets
might then sail both from Phoenicia and from the Red Sea to fetch
the gold of Ophir。
（4） This god of flies seems to have been so called； as was the
like god among the Greeks； from his supposed power over flies； in
driving them away from the flesh of their sacrifices； which
otherwise would have been very troublesome to them。
（5） It is commonly esteemed a very cruel action of Elijah； when
he called for fire from heaven； and consumed no fewer than two
captains and a hundred soldiers； and this for no other crime than
obeying the orders of their king； in attempting to seize him； and
it is owned by our Savior； that it was an instance of greater
severity than the spirit of the New Testament allows； Luke 9：54。
But then we must consider that it is not unlikely that these
captains and soldiers believed that they were sent to fetch the
prophet； that he might be put to death for foretelling the death
of the king； and this while they knew him to be the prophet of
the true God； the supreme King of Israel； （for they were still
under the theocracy；） which was no less than impiety； rebellion；
and treason； in the highest degree： nor would the command of a
subaltern； or inferior captain； contradicting the commands of the
general； when the captain and the soldiers both knew it to be so；
as I suppose； justify or excuse such gross rebellion and
disobedience in soldiers at this day。 Accordingly； when Saul
commanded his guards to slay Ahimelech and the priests at Nob；
they knew it to be an unlawful command； and would not obey it； 1
Samuel 22：17。 From which cases both officers and soldiers may
learn； that the commands of their leaders or kings cannot justify
or excuse them in doing what is wicked in the sight of God； or in
fighting in an unjust cause； when they know it so to be。
（6） This practice of cutting down； or plucking up by the roots；
the fruit trees was forbidden； even in ordinary wars； by the law
of Moses； Deuteronomy 20：19； 20； and only allowed by God in this
particular case； when the Moabites were to be punished and cut
off in an extraordinary manner for their wickedness See Jeremiah
48：11…13； and many the like prophecies against them。 Nothing
could therefore justify this practice but a particular commission
from God by his prophet； as in the present case； which was ever a
sufficient warrant for breaking any such ritual or ceremonial law
whatsoever。
（7） That this woman who cried to Elisha； and who in our Bible is
styled 〃the wife of one of the sons of the prophets；〃 2 Kings
4：1； was no other than the widow of Obadiah； the good steward of
Ahab； is confirmed by the Chaldee paraphrast； and by the Rabbins
and others。 Nor is that unlikely which Josephus here adds； that
these debts were contracted by her husband for the support of
those 〃hundred of the Lord's prophets； whom he maintained by
fifty in a cave；〃 in the days of Ahab and Jezebel； 1 Kings 18：4；
which circumstance rendered it highly fit that the prophet Elisha
should provide her a remedy； and enable her to redeem herself and
her sons from the fear of that slavery which insolvent debtors
were liable to by the law of Moses； Leviticus 25：39； Matthew
18：25； which he did accordingly； with God's help； at the expense
of a miracle。
（8） Dr。 Hudson； with very good reason； suspects that there is no
small defect in our present copies of Josephus； just before the
beginning of this section； and that chiefly as to that distinct
account which he had given us reason to expect in the first
section； and to which he seems to refer； ch。 8。 sect。 6。
concerning the glorious miracles which Elisha wrought； which
indeed in our Bibles are not a few； 2 Kings 6…9。； but of which we
have several omitted in Josephus's present copies。 One of those
histories； omitted at present； was evidently in his Bible； I mean
that of the curing of Nanman's leprosy； 2 Kings 5。； for he
plainly alludes to it； B。 III。 ch。 11。 sect。 4； where he
observes； that 〃there were lepers in many nations who yet have
been in honor； and not only free from reproach and avoidance； but
who have been great captains of armies； and been intrusted with
high offices in the commonwealth； and have had the privilege of
entering into holy places and temples。〃 But what makes me most
regret the want of that history in our present copies of Josephus
is this； that we have here； as it is commonly understood； one of
the greatest difficulties in all the Bible； that in 2 Kings 5：18；
19； where Naaman； after he had been miraculously cured by a
prophet of the true God； and had thereupon promised （ver。 17）
that 〃he would henceforth offer neither burnt…offering nor
sacrifice unto other gods； but unto the Lord；〃 adds； 〃In this
thing the Lord pardon thy servant； that when my master goeth into
the house of Rimnu to worship there； and he leaneth on my hands；
and I bow myself in the house of Rimmort； when I bow down myself
in the house of Rimmort； the Lord pardon thy servant in this
thing。 And Elisha said； Go in peace。〃 This looks like a prophet's
permission for being partaker in idolatry itself； out of
compliance with an idolatrous court。
（9） Upon occasion of this stratagem of Elisha； in Josephus； we
may take notice； that although Josephus was one of the greatest
lovers of truth in the world； yet in a just war he seems to have
had