按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
their loyalty is insincere。 It is not so with this one's human property；
their loyalty is genuine； earnest； sincere； enthusiastic。 The sentiment
which they feel for her is one which goes out in sheer perfection to no
other occupant of a throne； for it is love； pure from doubt； envy；
exaction； fault…seeking； a love whose sun has no spotthat form of love；
strong； great； uplifting； limitless； whose vast proportions are
compassable by no word but one； the prodigious word； Worship。 And it is
not as a human being that her subjects worship her； but as a supernatural
one； a divine one； one who has comradeship with God； and speaks by His
voice。
Mrs。 Eddy has herself created all these personal grandeurs and
autocracieswith others which I have not （in this article） mentioned。
They place her upon an Alpine solitude and supremacy of power and
spectacular show not hitherto attained by any other self…seeking enslaver
disguised in the Christian name； and they persuade me that； although she
may regard 〃self…deification as blasphemous；〃 she is as fond of it as I
am of pie。
She knows about 〃Our Mother's Room〃 in the Supreme Church in Boston
above referred tofor she has been in it。 In a recently published North
American Review article； I quoted a lady as saying Mrs。 Eddy's portrait
could be seen there in a shrine； lit by always…burning lights； and that
C。S。 disciples came and worshiped it。 That remark hurt the feelings of
more than one Scientist。 They said it was not true； and asked me to
correct it。 I comply with pleasure。 Whether the portrait was there four
years ago or not； it is not there now； for I have inquired。 The only
object in the shrine now； and lit by electricsand worshipedis an oil…
portrait of the horse…hair chair Mrs。 Eddy used to sit in when she was
writing Science and Health！ It seems to me that adulation has struck
bottom； here。
Mrs。 Eddy knows about that。 She has been there； she has seen it； she has
seen the worshippers。 She could abolish that sarcasm with a word。 She
withholds the word。 Once more I seem to recognize in her exactly the
same appetite for self…deification that I have for pie。 We seem to be
curiously alike； for the love of self…deification is really only the
spiritual form of the material appetite for pie； and nothing could be
more strikingly Christian…Scientifically 〃harmonious。〃
I note this phrase：
〃Christian Science eschews divine rights in human beings。〃
〃Rights〃 is vague； I do not know what it means there。 Mrs。 Eddy is not
well acquainted with the English language； and she is seldom able to say
in it what she is trying to say。 She has no ear for the exact word； and
does not often get it。 〃Rights。〃 Does it mean 〃honors？〃 〃attributes？〃
〃Eschews。〃 This is another umbrella where there should be a torch； it
does not illumine the sentence； it only deepens the shadows。 Does she
mean 〃denies？〃 〃refuses？〃 〃forbids？〃 or something in that line？ Does she
mean：
〃Christian Science denies divine honors to human beings？〃 Or：
〃Christian Science refuses to recognize divine attributes in human
beings？〃 Or：
〃Christian Science forbids the worship of human beings？〃
The bulk of the succeeding sentence is to me a tunnel； but； when I emerge
at this end of it； I seem to come into daylight。 Then I seem to
understand both sentenceswith this result：
〃Christian Science recognizes but one God； forbids the worship of human
beings； and refuses to recognize the possession of divine attributes by
any member of the race。〃
I am subject to correction； but I think that that is about what Mrs。 Eddy
was intending to convey。 Has her Englishwhich is always difficult to
mebeguiled me into misunderstanding the following remark； which she
makes （calling herself 〃we；〃 after an old regal fashion of hers） in her
preface to her Miscellaneous Writings？
〃While we entertain decided views as to the best method for elevating the
race physically； morally； and spiritually； and shall express these views
as duty demands； we shall claim no especial gift from our divine organ；
no supernatural power。〃
Was she meaning to say：
〃Although I am of divine origin and gifted with supernatural power； I
shall not draw upon these resources in determining the best method of
elevating the race？〃
If she had left out the word 〃our；〃 she might then seem to say：
〃I claim no especial or unusual degree of divine origin〃
Which is awkwardmost awkward； for one either has a divine origin or
hasn't； shares in it； degrees of it； are surely impossible。 The idea of
crossed breeds in cattle is a thing we can entertain； for we are used to
it； and it is possible； but the idea of a divine mongrel is unthinkable。
Well； then； what does she mean？ I am sure I do not know； for certain。
It is the word 〃our〃 that makes all the trouble。 With the 〃our〃 in； she
is plainly saying 〃my divine origin。〃 The word 〃from〃 seems to be
intended to mean 〃on account of。〃 It has to mean that or nothing； if
〃our〃 is allowed to stay。 The clause then says：
〃I shall claim no especial gift on account of my divine origin。〃
And I think that the full sentence was intended to mean what I have
already suggested：
〃Although I am of divine origin； and gifted with supernatural power； I
shall not draw upon these resources in determining the best method of
elevating the race。〃
When Mrs。 Eddy copyrighted that Preface seven years ago； she had long
been used to regarding herself as a divine personage。 I quote from Mr。
F。 W。 Peabody's book：
〃In the Christian Science Journal for April； 1889； when it was her
property； and published by her； it was claimed for her； and with her
sanction； that she was equal with Jesus； and elaborate effort was made to
establish the claim。〃
〃Mrs。 Eddy has distinctly authorized the claim in her behalf； that she
herself was the chosen successor to and equal of Jesus。〃
The following remark in that April number； quoted by Mr。 Peabody；
indicates that her claim had been previously made； and had excited
〃horror〃 among some 〃good people〃：
〃Now； a word about the horror many good people have of our making the
Author of Science and Health 'equal with Jesus。'〃
Surely； if it had excited horror in Mrs。 Eddy also； she would have
published a disclaimer。 She owned the paper； she could say what she
pleased in its columns。 Instead of rebuking her editor； she lets him
rebuke those 〃good people〃 for objecting to the claim。
These things seem to throw light upon those words； 〃our ＇my＇ divine
origin。〃
It may be that 〃Christian Science eschews divine rights in human beings；〃
and forbids worship of any but 〃one God； one Christ〃； but； if that is the
case； it looks as if Mrs。 Eddy is a very unsound Christian Scientist； and
needs disciplining。 I believe she has a serious malady〃self…
deification〃； and that it will be well to have one of the experts
demonstrate over it。
Meantime； let her go on livingfor my sake。 Closely examined；
painstakingly studied； she is easily the most interesting person on the
planet； and； in several ways； as easily the most extraordinary woman that
was ever born upon it。
P。S。Since I wrote the foregoing； Mr。 McCrackan's article appeared （in
the March number of the North American Review）。 Before his article
appearedthat is to say； during December； January； and FebruaryI had
written a new book； a character…portrait of Mrs。 Eddy； drawn from her own
acts and words； and it was thentogether with the three brief articles
previously published in the North American Reviewready to be delivered
to the printer for issue in book form。 In that book； by accident and
good luck； I have answered the objections made by Mr。 McCrackan to my
views； and therefore do not need to add an answer here。 Also； in it I
have corrected certain misstatements of mine which he has noticed； and
several others which he has not referred to。 There are one or two
important matters of opinion upon which he and I are not in disagreement；
but there are others upon which we must continue to disagree； I suppose；
indeed； I know we must； for instance； he believes Mrs。 Eddy wrote Science
and Health； whereas I am quite sure I can convince a person unhampered by
predilections that she did not。
As concerns one considerable matter I hope to convert him。 He believes
Mrs。 Eddy's word； in his article he cites her as a witness； and takes her
testimony at par； but if he will make an excursion through my book when
it comes out； and will dispassionately examine her testimonies as there
accumulated； I think he will in candor concede that she is by a large
percentage the most erratic and contradictory and untrustworthy witness
that has occupied the stand since the days of the lamented Ananias。
CONCLUSION
Broadly speaking； the hostiles reject and repudiate all the pretensions
of Christian Science Christianity。 They affirm that it has added nothing
new to Christianity； that it can do nothing that Christianity could not
do and was not doing before Christian Science was born。
In that case is there no field for the new Christianity； no opportunity
for usefulness； precious usefulness； great and distinguished usefulness？
I think there i