友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
九色书籍 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

30+mba-第70章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



Strategy 267 
for 23bn (£11。6bn) in May 2008。 Chicago…based Wrigley; which launched 
its Spearmint and Juicy Fruit gums in the 1890s; has specialized in chewing 
gum ever since and consistently outperformed its more diversified petitors。 
Wrigley is the only major consumer products pany to grow 
fortably faster than the population in its markets and above the rate of 
inflation。 Over the past decade or so; for example; other consumer products 
panies have diversified。 Gille。。e moved into ba。。eries; used to drive 
many of its products; by acquiring Duracell。 Nestlé bought Ralston Purina; 
Dreyer’s; Ice Cream Partners and Chef America。 Both have trailed Wrigley’s 
performance。 
Businesses o。。en lose their focus over time and periodically have to rediscover 
their core strategic purpose。 Procter & Gamble is an example of a 
business that had to refocus to cure weak growth。 In 2000; the pany was 
losing share in seven of its top nine categories; and had lowered earnings 
expectations four times in two quarters。 This prompted the pany to 
restructure and refocus on its core business: big brands; big customers and 
big countries。 They sold off non…core businesses; establishing five global 
business units with a closely focused product portfolio。 
First…to…market fallacy 
Gaining ‘first mover advantage’ are words used like a mantra to justify high 
expenditure and a headlong rush into new strategic areas。 This concept is 
one of the most enduring in business theory and practice。 Entrepreneurs 
and established giants are always in a race to be first。 Research from the 
1980s that shows that market pioneers have enduring advantages in distribution; 
product…line breadth; product quality and; especially; market 
share underscores this principle。 
Beguiling though the theory of first mover advantage is; it is probably 
wrong。 Gerard Tellis; of the University of Southern California; and Peter 
Golder; of New York University’s Stern Business School; argued in their 
book Will and Vision: How Lateers Grow to Dominate Markets (2001; 
McGraw…Hill Inc。; United States) and subsequent research that previous 
studies on the subject were deeply flawed。 In the first instance; earlier 
studies were based on surveys of surviving panies and brands; 
excluding all the pioneers that failed。 This helps some panies to 
look as though they were first to market even when they were not。 
Procter & Gamble (P&G) boasts that it created America’s disposablenappy 
(diaper) business。 In fact a pany called Chux launched its 
product a quarter of a century before P&G entered the market in 1961。 
Also; the questions used to gather much of the data in earlier research were 
at best ambiguous; and perhaps dangerously so。 For example; the term; 
‘one of the pioneers in first developing such products or services;’ was 
used as a proxy for ‘first to market’。 The authors emphasize their point by 
268 The Thirty…Day MBA 
listing popular misconceptions of who were the real pioneers across the 
66 markets they analysed。 Online book sales – Amazon (wrong); Books。 
 (right) – Copiers; Xerox (wrong); IBM (right) – PCs; IBM/Apple (both 
wrong); Micro Instrumentation Telemetry Systems (MITS) introduced its 
PC the Altair; a 400 kit; in 1974; followed by Tandy Corporation (Radio 
Shack) in 1977。 
In fact the most pelling evidence from all the research was that nearly 
half of all firms pursuing a first…to…market strategy were fated to fail; while 
those following fairly close behind were three times as likely to succeed。 
Tellis and Golder claim that the best strategy is to enter the market 19 years 
a。。er pioneers; learn from their mistakes; benefit from their product and 
market development and be more certain about customer preferences。 
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS 
Aside from articulating the generic approach to business strategy; Porter’s 
other major contribution to the field was what has bee known as the 
Five Forces theory of industry structure (Figure 12。2)。 Porter postulated that 
the five forces that drive petition in an industry have to be understood 
as part of the process of choosing which of the three generic strategies to 
pursue。 The forces he identified are: 
。 Threat of substitution: Can customers buy something else instead of 
your product? For example; Apple; and to a lesser extent Sony; have 
laptop puters that are distinctive enough to make substitution 
difficult。 Dell; on the other hand; faces intense petition from dozens 
of other suppliers with near…identical products peting mostly on 
price alone。 
。 Threat of new entrants: If it is easy to enter your market; start…up 
costs are low and there are no barriers to entry such as IP (intellectual 
property) protection; then the threat is high。 
。 Supplier power: The fewer the suppliers; usually the more powerful 
they are。 Oil is a classic example; where less than a dozen countries 
supply the whole market and consequently can set prices。 
。 Buyer power: In the food market; for example; with just a few; powerful 
supermarket buyers being supplied by thousands of much smaller 
businesses; they are o。。en able to dictate terms。 
。 Industry petition: The number and capability of petitors is one 
determinant of a business’s power。 Few petitors with relatively 
less a。。ractive products or services lower the intensity of rivalry in a 
sector。 O。。en these sectors slip into oligopolistic (see also Chapter 7; 
Economics) behaviour; preferring to collude rather than pete。
Strategy 269 
You can see a video clip of Professor Porter discussing the Five Forces model 
on the Harvard Business School website (h。。p://harvardbusinessonline。 
hbsp。harvard。edu/hbrol/en/archive/archive。jhtml 》 Strategy and Execution 
》 By Author P 》 The Five petitive Forces that Shape petition)。 
SHAPING STRATEGY – TOOLS AND 
TECHNIQUES 
While Porter’s Five Forces approach to strategy formulation is; as far as 
business schools are concerned at least; the standard starting point; there 
are a number of other tools that an MBA needs to be familiar with。 Some 
pre…date Porter; some overlap; while others home in on specific issues。 Like 
many such tools; they overlap with those used in marketing and in this book 
you will find SWOT (strengths; weaknesses; threats and opportunities) and 
perceptual mapping covered in Chapter 3; Marketing。 
These are the main tools and techniques an MBA will be expected to 
know and understand。 
Figure 12。2 Five Forces theory of industry analysis (a。。er Porter) 
Threat of new entrants 
。 Economies of scale 
。 Capital intensity 
。 Access to marketing channels 
。 Brand loyalty 
。 Government regulations 
。 IP and other barriers to entry 
Industry petition 
。 Many petitors 
。 Some powerful petitors 
。 High exit barriers 
。 Strong brands 
Buyer power 
。 Buyer concentration 
。 Relative size; buyer much 
bigger 
。 Buyers’ ability for backward 
or forward integration 
。 Price sensitivity 
Threat of substitutes 
。 Cost of switching 
。 Relative price 
。 Relative performance 
。 Relative quality 
Supplier power 
。 Concentration of suppliers 
。 Not a key customer to suppliers 
。 Threat of supplier backward or 
forward integration 
。 Relative size; suppliers much bigger 
Intensity of rivalry 
。 Industry growth rate 
。 Rate of technological 
change 
。 Effect of five forces
270 The Thirty…Day MBA 
Ansoff’s Growth Matrix 
Igor Ansoff; while Professor of Industrial Administration in the Graduate 
School at Carnegie Mellon University; published his landmark book; Corporate 
Strategy (1965); where he explained a way of categorizing strategies 
as an aid to understanding the nature of the risks involved。 He invited his 
students to consider growth options as a square matrix divided into four 
segments。 The axes are labelled with products and services running along 
the ‘x’ axis; starting with ‘present’ and ‘new’; and markets up the ‘y’ axis 
similarly labelled (Figure 12。3)。 
Figure 12。3 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix 
Existing products New products 
Existing markets Market penetration Product development 
New markets Market development Diversification 
Horizontal 
Vertical 
Concentric 
Conglomerate 
Ansoff then went on to assign titles to each type of strategy; in an ascending 
scale of risk (you can find out more about the matrix at  
strategyvectormodel 》 Theories 》 Ansoff Matrix): 
。 Market penetration; which involves selling more of your existing products 
and services to existing customers – the lowest…risk strategy。 
。 Product/service development; which involves creating extensions to 
your existing products or new products to sell to your existing customer 
base。 This is more risky than market penetration; but less risky than 
entering a new market where you will face new petitors and may 
not understand the customers as well as you do your current ones。 
。 Market development involves entering new market segments or pletely 
new markets either in your home country or abroad。 
。 Diversification is selling new products into new markets; the riskiest 
strategy as both are relative unknowns。 Avoid; unless all other strategies 
have been exhausted。 Diversification can
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!